News

High school district cautiously begins search for new superintendent

Sequoia Union High School District Superintendent Mary Streshly, on August 24, 2017, shortly after she joined the district. Photo by Ana Sofia Amieva-Wang.

Sequoia Union High School District governing board members had an important question for the search firm that helped find its last superintendent, who resigned earlier this fall after calls for her firing: "How do we do this differently for a longer-lasting result?"

The school board on Nov. 10 interviewed three consulting firms that could conduct the hiring process for a new superintendent to replace Mary Streshly, including Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates (HYA), which helped the board hire Streshly three years ago. Streshly departed after the district's teachers union and most of its top administrators called for her ouster.

Trustee Chris Thomsen HYA asked what he called "an empirically awkward question."

"Our superintendent (Streshly) served a shorter time than we (the board) expected," Thomsen said. "Do you have any reflections on the last search (process)?"

Carolyn McKennan, a vice president for HYA, said district officials perhaps could have offered Streshly more coaching or "honest feedback" early into her tenure that could have helped her better adjust to the district.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Almanac Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

"(Streshly was) coming from one environment that wasn't quite as metropolitan, but that's hindsight," McKennan said. "Beyond that I didn't have contact with her after she joined the district. … Sometimes the match was just not there; maybe we could have done nothing better."

The firm said that its superintendent selections generally are longterm hires, with 85% staying with a district for five years or more. HYA helped the Portola Valley and Las Lomitas elementary school districts select their most recent superintendents.

William Huyett, a consultant for McPherson & Jacobson, L.L.C., promised his firm could find the district a longterm leader.

Shawneece Stevenson and Rich Ginn, Sequoia district school board candidates who are on track to win seats in the Nov. 3 election, according to the latest results, attended the meeting and asked questions.

In July, the district's teachers union and 22 principals and top administrators called for Streshly's firing, accusing her of mishandling the district's COVID-19 response and said she has a history of ineffectual leadership.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

After weeks of closed session meetings about Streshly, the board said she resigned in September "to fulfill critical care responsibilities with her family."

Streshly became Sequoia Union High School District superintendent in July of 2017, signing on with a salary of $240,500 per year.

Assistant Superintendent Crystal Leach is filling in as interim superintendent until the board hires a replacement for Streshly.

Search timeline

The newly seated school board will likely select a search firm at its Dec. 16 meeting, board President Allen Weiner said during the recent meeting.

The board will need to decide how it will conduct interviews virtually or in-person, given the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Each of the firms vying for the contract would expect the district to have a finalist for the role selected by spring 2021.

HYA's proposed timeline has the board hiring a new superintendent around April 2021.

McPherson & Jacobson said it could have a superintendent finalist by March 2021.

The third search firm the board interviewed, Leadership Associates, estimates it could have a finalist for the position by mid-April.

Costs

• HYA: $21,500. HYA also offers additional superintendent transition services, which include: a board governance workshop at $1,000 per day; board goal-setting and a superintendent evaluation at $1,000 per day; and comprehensive first year coaching and support for $5,000 per year.

• McPherson & Jacobson: $16,000. Expenses are limited to $3,150 for a total of not more than $19,150 and include: online meetings; media advertising; video interviews for five candidates; copying, postage and phone expenses; travel and associated consultant expenses.

• Leadership Associates: $26,000. Services include recruitment of candidates and background checks; gathering of community and staff input and providing the board with a written report, including an online survey, and organizing interviews.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

High school district cautiously begins search for new superintendent

by / Almanac

Uploaded: Sun, Nov 15, 2020, 8:39 am

Sequoia Union High School District governing board members had an important question for the search firm that helped find its last superintendent, who resigned earlier this fall after calls for her firing: "How do we do this differently for a longer-lasting result?"

The school board on Nov. 10 interviewed three consulting firms that could conduct the hiring process for a new superintendent to replace Mary Streshly, including Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates (HYA), which helped the board hire Streshly three years ago. Streshly departed after the district's teachers union and most of its top administrators called for her ouster.

Trustee Chris Thomsen HYA asked what he called "an empirically awkward question."

"Our superintendent (Streshly) served a shorter time than we (the board) expected," Thomsen said. "Do you have any reflections on the last search (process)?"

Carolyn McKennan, a vice president for HYA, said district officials perhaps could have offered Streshly more coaching or "honest feedback" early into her tenure that could have helped her better adjust to the district.

"(Streshly was) coming from one environment that wasn't quite as metropolitan, but that's hindsight," McKennan said. "Beyond that I didn't have contact with her after she joined the district. … Sometimes the match was just not there; maybe we could have done nothing better."

The firm said that its superintendent selections generally are longterm hires, with 85% staying with a district for five years or more. HYA helped the Portola Valley and Las Lomitas elementary school districts select their most recent superintendents.

William Huyett, a consultant for McPherson & Jacobson, L.L.C., promised his firm could find the district a longterm leader.

Shawneece Stevenson and Rich Ginn, Sequoia district school board candidates who are on track to win seats in the Nov. 3 election, according to the latest results, attended the meeting and asked questions.

In July, the district's teachers union and 22 principals and top administrators called for Streshly's firing, accusing her of mishandling the district's COVID-19 response and said she has a history of ineffectual leadership.

After weeks of closed session meetings about Streshly, the board said she resigned in September "to fulfill critical care responsibilities with her family."

Streshly became Sequoia Union High School District superintendent in July of 2017, signing on with a salary of $240,500 per year.

Assistant Superintendent Crystal Leach is filling in as interim superintendent until the board hires a replacement for Streshly.

The newly seated school board will likely select a search firm at its Dec. 16 meeting, board President Allen Weiner said during the recent meeting.

The board will need to decide how it will conduct interviews virtually or in-person, given the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Each of the firms vying for the contract would expect the district to have a finalist for the role selected by spring 2021.

HYA's proposed timeline has the board hiring a new superintendent around April 2021.

McPherson & Jacobson said it could have a superintendent finalist by March 2021.

The third search firm the board interviewed, Leadership Associates, estimates it could have a finalist for the position by mid-April.

• HYA: $21,500. HYA also offers additional superintendent transition services, which include: a board governance workshop at $1,000 per day; board goal-setting and a superintendent evaluation at $1,000 per day; and comprehensive first year coaching and support for $5,000 per year.

• McPherson & Jacobson: $16,000. Expenses are limited to $3,150 for a total of not more than $19,150 and include: online meetings; media advertising; video interviews for five candidates; copying, postage and phone expenses; travel and associated consultant expenses.

• Leadership Associates: $26,000. Services include recruitment of candidates and background checks; gathering of community and staff input and providing the board with a written report, including an online survey, and organizing interviews.

Comments

Local Parent
Registered user
Menlo Park: Downtown
on Nov 15, 2020 at 11:27 am
Local Parent, Menlo Park: Downtown
Registered user
on Nov 15, 2020 at 11:27 am

So what will become of:
1) the hybrid reopening plan that many parents and students are still desperate for, the outsized influence of the teachers union, and
2) Tide Academy, bolstered by the friendship with Streshly, and then besot with turmoil? In the open house, they mentioned they had only ~50 students in the 2nd class out of the 100 planned. I'd like to consider it for my kids, but really need to know why parents are rejecting it and what is changing to address those concerns.


Joseph E. Davis
Registered user
Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Nov 15, 2020 at 7:03 pm
Joseph E. Davis, Woodside: Emerald Hills
Registered user
on Nov 15, 2020 at 7:03 pm

Hybrid learning with in class time? You can forget it for this school year. The teachers' union calls the shots.


susannahID
Registered user
Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Nov 16, 2020 at 12:28 pm
susannahID, Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
Registered user
on Nov 16, 2020 at 12:28 pm

The Board is right to ask questions about why the last search process resulted in a short tenure. My observation watching the SUHSD Board with Dr Streshly is that she and her team presented recommendations with insufficient supporting information and analysis and that the Board did not press for more and better work before their decisions. Instead they pushed ahead. The Board did not criticize her work in cases where in their shoes I would have. The Board did not lead and exercise the supervision that they were elected to provide on behalf of the community.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.