Town Square

Post a New Topic

High Speed Rail: An open letter to Assemblyman Jerry HIl

Original post made by Morris Brown, Menlo Park: Park Forest, on Nov 1, 2012

Open letter to Assemblyman Jerry Hill:

I was astounded to hear you state, in the Candidate forum, defending your vote on the High Speed Rail appropriation in July, that you did not vote to approve a $68 billion High Speed Rail project. You stated your vote was to bring $1 billion to electrify CalTrain along a 2 track corridor and also to send funds down south for other regional rail.

Really! The appropriation contained $6 billion to start the High Speed Rail project in the Central Valley. The appropriation also approved spending $1.2 billion of the $9 billion authorized by the voter approved Prop 1A bond funding in 2008, to improve or modernize regional rail.

The big problem is, Assemblyman Hill, that this $1.2 billion appropriation is clearly illegal. Prop 1A says these funds are to be used for a State wide HSR project and not for regional commuter rail. That is what the voters approved in 2008, and the Legislature has no right to change what the voters approved. This defense for your vote, is clearly not valid.

Right now, Governor Brown is running up and down the State promoting Prop 30, a $50 billion tax increase, stating these funds will be used to fund schools, State colleges and Sate Universities and that failure of the voters to approve Prop 30 will mean further cuts to these institutions.

Why should any voter believe what the Governor promises? When you read Prop 30, you see the funds go into the General fund and can be spent as approved. Yes, the funds could be spent on education, but there is no legal mandate to do so, only the Governor’s promise that this will be the result.

The High Speed Rail appropriation in July was pushed through by Governor Brown, Senator Darrell Steinberg, and Senator Mark Leno. Here you had the Governor spending Prop 1A funds for projects clearly prohibited by the conditions in Prop 1A. Again, why should any voter believe the Governor, or the Legislature will end up spending the funds from the increased taxes if Prop 30 passes, for the educational system of the State? They just have no credibility.

Morris Brown
Menlo Park, CA


A link on YouTube to the 2 minute video of Assemblyman Hill's statement is located at:

Web Link

(2 minutes)

text of what you said...

....but where the miss understanding is, people think that the Legislature voted 68 billion dollars for a High Speed Rail system in June, where all they voted for was 4.6 billion dollars of bond money to be used in this area, this peninsula, and the region will get over a billion dollars of that money for electrification of CalTrain, positive train controls, get new Bart train, which has the oldest fleet in the country right now for public transit. So those are the opportunities we are going to get and Southern California will get the same public transit benefits and will be some in the valley. So there is no 68 billion dollar vote for High Speed Rail. And if there is one in the future it will have to stand on its own, and it will have to prove the utility independently of anything else to get my vote for High Speed Rail. I voted for the electrification of CalTrain and the guarantee in writing that it will be a 2 track blended system on the peninsula.

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Nov 1, 2012 at 7:59 pm

When the legislature approved HSR they eliminated any chance that I or many I know will vote for Prop 30. If we can afford to fund HSR we sure as hell don't need a tax increase. Obviously we have plenty fo surplus money to throw around.

Vote NO on Prop 30. This is nothing more than a politcal payoff to labor unions. While you're at it vote YES on prop 32 so labor unions have to actually get PERMISION from the rank and file to use their dues for political purposes. Of course, we all know what will happen if the labor unions have to actually get permission to piss away the rank and files' dues on political contributions....the rank and file will say HELL NO!!!

Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on Nov 1, 2012 at 8:03 pm

I don't believe the Governor and voted AGAINST Prop 30.

What Jerry Hill is trying to say now requires the skills of a contortionist. Geez, Jerry, own your vote. Don't try to sell us a bunch of malarky.

Like this comment
Posted by against HSR but FOR prop 30
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Nov 4, 2012 at 2:54 pm

The way HSR has been handled is horrific. The 4 track designs promoted would ruin our town.
Also horrific would be the cuts to essential services and education if Prop 30 isn't passed. It's the best solution available at this time. There is no way the legislature can ever reach 2/3 agreement on almost anything. We voters have to do our part. Vote YES on 30

Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Nov 4, 2012 at 5:42 pm

Sorry, if the legislature has 6 billion ot throw away they don't need any more of my money. The cuts that come to essential services will come because the legislature can't control its spending.


Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on Nov 4, 2012 at 7:37 pm

Newsflash: Our legislature no longer needs 2/3 agreement since we passed Prop 25. Now, the Democrats and Governor Brown can do WHATEVER they want.

I'm simply not willing to vote for any additional funds for a legislature that would spend $6 BILLION for a slow train between those two busy metroplexes called Fresno and Merced.

Here's an idea. Shut down the stupid train, fix the bloated public employee pensions, pay prison guards market pay and you'll have lots of money for teachers - who are, ironically, already among the highest paid in the country.

I hope Prop 30 goes down in flames...

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 4,159 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 954 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 383 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 375 views