Town Square

Post a New Topic

Portola Valley council rejects Cargill development

Original post made on Dec 14, 2010

The Cargill Salt Corp. proposal for a residential community on a salt flat off Redwood City should instead be restored as home for creatures that lived there before it was a salt flat, the Portola Valley Town Council said in resolution adopted on Dec. 8.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, December 14, 2010, 8:45 AM

Comments (7)

Posted by Advocate for Nature
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Dec 14, 2010 at 1:29 pm

FIVE STARS GOES TO PORTOLA VALLEY'S COUNCIL FOR THEIR WISDOM!!! The bay belongs to the creatures that call it home, and to all of us. The Cargill project must not be built based on the greed of those who would profit from it.


Posted by Gene Chaput
a resident of Portola Valley: Westridge
on Dec 14, 2010 at 4:46 pm

Great. Way to go PV Town Council. We're behind you 100%. What a nice Christmas present.


Posted by larry
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Dec 16, 2010 at 7:01 pm

It's Redwood City's decision. It doesn't matter what PV wants or doesn't want.


Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 16, 2010 at 8:11 pm

"It's Redwood City's decision. It doesn't matter what PV wants or doesn't want."
[Portion removed, terms of use.]


Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 16, 2010 at 9:14 pm

"It's Redwood City's decision. It doesn't matter what PV wants or doesn't want."

[Portion removed. Terms of use.]


Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of another community
on Dec 30, 2010 at 12:07 pm

At a time when thousands of people are *still* commuting into local jobs from as far away as Modesto and Stockton, spewing who knows how much car exhaust and wasting precious natural resources (most notably Time, the most precious and finite resource any of us have) the myopia of a good many "environmentalists" is stupefying.

To say nothing of how many critters were displaced by development out in the remote San Joaquin Valley, rather than here in an already urbanized area.

In short, fill in the swamps, let another Foster City bloom, and give your children (and by extension your granchildren) a chance to live near you, rather than many miles away.


Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle

on Jun 4, 2017 at 11:04 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Mountain View's Castro Street opens up for an eat-and-greet to rally support for businesses
By The Peninsula Foodist | 0 comments | 2,352 views

The questionable morality of abortion
By Diana Diamond | 7 comments | 2,075 views

Idaho Hot Springs and Yellowstone – Travelin’ Solo
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,234 views

Fidelity, Infidelity, Loyalty, Luck
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,056 views