A $265 million measure would raise taxes by about $16 per $100,000 of a property's assessed value. With interest payments included, the cost to the taxpayer typically doubles.
Studies show wide support for a measure of up to $300 million among 800 likely voters, but also show that a campaign will be necessary. But how long a campaign?
A short campaign for a June election would make funds available to meet enrollment in 2016-17, about when the surge will start, but a short campaign also makes big demands on volunteers. They must quickly devise a strategy, arrange endorsements, set up and staff phone banks, and advertise. Professional help is available, but at a cost. Will donors step forward in time, in sufficient numbers, and with sufficient contributions?
A November election gives ample time for all this, but voter turnout will be higher — not usually desirable when asking for a tax increase — and competing finance measures may complicate things.
This story contains 238 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.