Workshop ahead on water district's future | November 13, 2013 | Almanac | Almanac Online |

Almanac

News - November 13, 2013

Workshop ahead on water district's future

by Dave Boyce

There is uncertainty ahead for residents within the Los Trancos County Water District. The district's seven-year habit of spending property tax revenues to prevent wildfires, channel storm-water runoff, and preserve 5.7 acres of open space is threatened by the possible dissolution of the district.

This story contains 226 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Subscribe

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Portola Valley Resident
a resident of Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
on Nov 12, 2013 at 4:11 pm

Thank you for announcing the upcoming LAFCo workshop which will discuss all the governance options for the Los Trancos County Water District. Your article did not mention that there are 3 alternatives which this district can pursue. Straight dissolution with all tax revenues distributed to all 10 local agencies; activation of latent powers for fire safety and storm water drainage and finally, the one option, which is never really discussed in any of your previous articles, district dissolution with the concurrent establishment of Zones of Benefit or maintenance districts managed within County agencies allowing for local control of those transferred services and funds. Citizen advisory groups would work with these agencies to ensure that our fire safety and drainage needs are addressed yearly.

My personal belief that our district cannot govern itself anymore and needs experienced and professional management from the relative county agencies and special districts. Talk of spending $4M for a new drainage infrastructure on an annual district budget of $290,000 is madness. We have no engineering staff or board experience managing multi-million dollar projects. Let us give up the ghost and move on!


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.