News

Belle Haven, East Palo Alto have far fewer trees than neighboring communities. Groups like Canopy hope to change that

Neighborhoods with fewer trees are more susceptible to harm from climate change

Rinconada Park in Palo Alto is full of oak trees, including this one which grows next to Rinconada Pool. File photo by Veronica Weber.

Community members are up bright and early on Nov. 20 at All Five, a preschool in Menlo Park's Belle Haven neighborhood.

And they're hard at work. Students are digging holes with shovels taller than they are. Parents are wicking away dirt from tree roots. Marty Deggeller, who's been planting for 25 years in the area, stabilizes the young tree with a metal pipe so it will grow straight. By the end of the event, they'll have planted 17 trees on the school grounds with Canopy, a tree planting nonprofit.

A Canopy volunteer places mulch around a newly planted tree during a tree planting event at Willow Oaks Scool in Menlo Park on June 20, 2015. Photo courtesy of Canopy.

Belle Haven residents Maria Cruz and her son Jeff Caceres dig holes together by the playhouse. For Cruz, the event is a special moment for her family and the community at large.

"I want my son to come back in 10, 15 years and see how it's doing," Cruz says. "Trees are very important for us. Everyone should have them."

But in reality, not all communities do. There's a severe shortage of tree canopy coverage in low-income neighborhoods. As average temperatures rise in the Bay Area, this means more extreme heat days for vulnerable communities.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Palo Alto, a city with a median annual income of $158,000, has tree canopy coverage as high as 25% in some neighborhoods, according to the Healthy Places Index. Trees occupy a fourth of the land within the city.

Adjacent East Palo Alto, where three in four residents are either Black or Latino, has a median income of $67,000. HPI shows one neighborhood with canopy coverage of 12%. The rest have 6%.

Technically, the two regions are separate cities that fall under different counties. However, tree coverage disparities fester within city boundaries too. Most of Menlo Park has between 15-31% tree canopy coverage, according to the Healthy Places Index. The predominantly lower income Belle Haven neighborhood has 7% coverage.

"You walk around a poor neighborhood and it's just concrete. There's no shade structure. No respite from the sun," says Emi Wang, associate director of Capacity Building at the Greenlining Institute, an Oakland-based organization that advocates for racial and environmental justice.

And this has been an issue spanning decades. Uriel Hernandez, a board member with Canopy, has lived in East Palo Alto his whole life. He noticed the disparity as a child, he says.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

"I grew up a block from the freeway, so as a kid I had asthma," Hernandez. "I was never around trees or nature."

Trees surround the old Atherton Library. Atherton is known for its dense tree canopy and sky-high real estate prices. File photo.

Why is this a problem?

Tree canopy coverage provides more than just aesthetics. Scientists have shown that as there's more shade from trees, temperatures cool below the canopy line.

More canopy could be a savior during scorching summers. Average Bay Area temperatures rose nearly two degrees from 1950-2005, according to research from the state Energy Commission. By 2050, average temperature is projected to jump an additional degree.

Shade from trees slashes temperatures inside parked cars by 45 degrees, a study from the Journal of Arboriculture found.

Less shade over buildings means higher energy bills, a cost that disproportionately affects low-income families, Wang says.

There are secondary benefits too: more trees can help reduce crime, air pollution, and asthma rates within a community, Santa Clara County Senior Management Analyst Chris Curry says.

From an accessibility perspective, trees promote outdoor activity, says Maya Briones, an Advocacy Associate of Canopy. Cars drive slower in tree lined areas too, making communities more walkable.

Perhaps the most critical benefit to trees for California, currently in a state of emergency for the severe drought, are the water benefits. Trees slow down rainwater as the roots help soak up run-off, Curry says. This can then go into groundwater supply and cut the burden for stormwater management systems.

An oak tree, which is located on Upper Laurel School's campus, can be seen from French Court on Aug. 16, 2015. Photo by Michelle Le

How did we get here?

Nearly 80% of trees are on private property, Nareesh Duggal, Program Manager of Santa Clara County, says. That means it's up to residents to plant and maintain trees on their own.

For the well-resourced Palo Alto, that's easy. Most folks in East Palo Alto, however, are renters. They have to rely on landlords to plant enough trees to build up the canopy and renters themselves may not have enough disposable income to maintain the tree on their own. Water bills alone can be a huge burden.

A redwood tree at Juana Briones Park in Palo Alto was struck by lightning during a storm on September 11, 2017. Photo by Veronica Weber.

Local municipalities could opt to plant trees on city property, like street medians. However, governments, particularly those serving low-income communities, rarely have sufficient funding for green spaces. It's often the first program to get cut in the face of budget shortages, Duggal says.

"When the economy is down, the funding for these nature-based solutions, especially for urban forestry, is scaled back," Duggal says. "There are other priorities at that time for these public agencies."

Funding is also often allocated to tree planting; in reality, maintenance, albeit less exciting, is more important to tree health and longevity. Managing existing tree canopy garners less attention and funding, Duggal says.

"These trees may live to 300 years," Duggal says. "Saving an asset of that kind is more important than just planting."

Trees in East Palo Alto have historically not been well maintained, Briones says.

"There's a distrust between the community and the government. These big trees that are here, haven't been taken care of and they fall," Briones says. "They break up concrete. Why would they want more?"

Who are the problem solvers?

== Groups like Canopy are hoping to tackle the issue head-on. Canopy now serves five communities: Palo Alto, East Palo Alto, Belle Haven, North Fair Oaks, and Mountain View. In 2020, Canopy planted and tended to nearly 3,000 trees in the Peninsula.

From left, Bethzy Garcia, Adrian Maciel and Angel Patino, who are members of the Teen Urban Forester program, help plant a tree in the backyard of a home on Louis Road in Palo Alto as part of Canopy's planting event on Dec. 4. Photo by Gennady Sheyner.

Canopy's Nov. 20 event was meant to educate community members on the benefits of trees and involve local youth. Teen Urban Foresters, paid high school interns, help lead tree planting.

Briones led Canopy's Branching Out program for nearly two years. Within East Palo Alto, Briones and Canopy would find the optimal location for the tree in dwellers' lots, plant it themselves, and offer three years of maintenance at no cost.

In the past, Canopy even wrote checks out to East Palo Alto residents to pay a share of their water bills, Briones says. However, the funding eventually ran out.

Duggal calls for a partnership across city and county governments to provide a more resilient funding mechanism. Duggal proposes a parcel tax to fund this collaborative body: properties would be taxed based on characteristics like tree planting viability.

Project Manager Romain Taniere looks to outreach and community engagement to build up canopy. A resident to East Palo Alto for 20 years, he hosts block parties and brings in eco-friendly companies to open the eyes of neighbors, he says.

Regardless of the solution mechanism, Duggal and Briones agree: these policies need to be written with race and income in the purview.

"Everyone deserves trees," Briones says. "It shouldn't matter their socioeconomic status. That's what equity is."

This story was originally published by Peninsula Press, a project of Stanford Journalism Program.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local social justice news. Become a member today.

Belle Haven, East Palo Alto have far fewer trees than neighboring communities. Groups like Canopy hope to change that

Neighborhoods with fewer trees are more susceptible to harm from climate change

by Jennah Haque /Peninsula Press / Bay City News Service

Uploaded: Sat, Dec 25, 2021, 7:52 am

Community members are up bright and early on Nov. 20 at All Five, a preschool in Menlo Park's Belle Haven neighborhood.

And they're hard at work. Students are digging holes with shovels taller than they are. Parents are wicking away dirt from tree roots. Marty Deggeller, who's been planting for 25 years in the area, stabilizes the young tree with a metal pipe so it will grow straight. By the end of the event, they'll have planted 17 trees on the school grounds with Canopy, a tree planting nonprofit.

Belle Haven residents Maria Cruz and her son Jeff Caceres dig holes together by the playhouse. For Cruz, the event is a special moment for her family and the community at large.

"I want my son to come back in 10, 15 years and see how it's doing," Cruz says. "Trees are very important for us. Everyone should have them."

But in reality, not all communities do. There's a severe shortage of tree canopy coverage in low-income neighborhoods. As average temperatures rise in the Bay Area, this means more extreme heat days for vulnerable communities.

Palo Alto, a city with a median annual income of $158,000, has tree canopy coverage as high as 25% in some neighborhoods, according to the Healthy Places Index. Trees occupy a fourth of the land within the city.

Adjacent East Palo Alto, where three in four residents are either Black or Latino, has a median income of $67,000. HPI shows one neighborhood with canopy coverage of 12%. The rest have 6%.

Technically, the two regions are separate cities that fall under different counties. However, tree coverage disparities fester within city boundaries too. Most of Menlo Park has between 15-31% tree canopy coverage, according to the Healthy Places Index. The predominantly lower income Belle Haven neighborhood has 7% coverage.

"You walk around a poor neighborhood and it's just concrete. There's no shade structure. No respite from the sun," says Emi Wang, associate director of Capacity Building at the Greenlining Institute, an Oakland-based organization that advocates for racial and environmental justice.

And this has been an issue spanning decades. Uriel Hernandez, a board member with Canopy, has lived in East Palo Alto his whole life. He noticed the disparity as a child, he says.

"I grew up a block from the freeway, so as a kid I had asthma," Hernandez. "I was never around trees or nature."

Tree canopy coverage provides more than just aesthetics. Scientists have shown that as there's more shade from trees, temperatures cool below the canopy line.

More canopy could be a savior during scorching summers. Average Bay Area temperatures rose nearly two degrees from 1950-2005, according to research from the state Energy Commission. By 2050, average temperature is projected to jump an additional degree.

Shade from trees slashes temperatures inside parked cars by 45 degrees, a study from the Journal of Arboriculture found.

Less shade over buildings means higher energy bills, a cost that disproportionately affects low-income families, Wang says.

There are secondary benefits too: more trees can help reduce crime, air pollution, and asthma rates within a community, Santa Clara County Senior Management Analyst Chris Curry says.

From an accessibility perspective, trees promote outdoor activity, says Maya Briones, an Advocacy Associate of Canopy. Cars drive slower in tree lined areas too, making communities more walkable.

Perhaps the most critical benefit to trees for California, currently in a state of emergency for the severe drought, are the water benefits. Trees slow down rainwater as the roots help soak up run-off, Curry says. This can then go into groundwater supply and cut the burden for stormwater management systems.

Nearly 80% of trees are on private property, Nareesh Duggal, Program Manager of Santa Clara County, says. That means it's up to residents to plant and maintain trees on their own.

For the well-resourced Palo Alto, that's easy. Most folks in East Palo Alto, however, are renters. They have to rely on landlords to plant enough trees to build up the canopy and renters themselves may not have enough disposable income to maintain the tree on their own. Water bills alone can be a huge burden.

Local municipalities could opt to plant trees on city property, like street medians. However, governments, particularly those serving low-income communities, rarely have sufficient funding for green spaces. It's often the first program to get cut in the face of budget shortages, Duggal says.

"When the economy is down, the funding for these nature-based solutions, especially for urban forestry, is scaled back," Duggal says. "There are other priorities at that time for these public agencies."

Funding is also often allocated to tree planting; in reality, maintenance, albeit less exciting, is more important to tree health and longevity. Managing existing tree canopy garners less attention and funding, Duggal says.

"These trees may live to 300 years," Duggal says. "Saving an asset of that kind is more important than just planting."

Trees in East Palo Alto have historically not been well maintained, Briones says.

"There's a distrust between the community and the government. These big trees that are here, haven't been taken care of and they fall," Briones says. "They break up concrete. Why would they want more?"

== Groups like Canopy are hoping to tackle the issue head-on. Canopy now serves five communities: Palo Alto, East Palo Alto, Belle Haven, North Fair Oaks, and Mountain View. In 2020, Canopy planted and tended to nearly 3,000 trees in the Peninsula.

Canopy's Nov. 20 event was meant to educate community members on the benefits of trees and involve local youth. Teen Urban Foresters, paid high school interns, help lead tree planting.

Briones led Canopy's Branching Out program for nearly two years. Within East Palo Alto, Briones and Canopy would find the optimal location for the tree in dwellers' lots, plant it themselves, and offer three years of maintenance at no cost.

In the past, Canopy even wrote checks out to East Palo Alto residents to pay a share of their water bills, Briones says. However, the funding eventually ran out.

Duggal calls for a partnership across city and county governments to provide a more resilient funding mechanism. Duggal proposes a parcel tax to fund this collaborative body: properties would be taxed based on characteristics like tree planting viability.

Project Manager Romain Taniere looks to outreach and community engagement to build up canopy. A resident to East Palo Alto for 20 years, he hosts block parties and brings in eco-friendly companies to open the eyes of neighbors, he says.

Regardless of the solution mechanism, Duggal and Briones agree: these policies need to be written with race and income in the purview.

"Everyone deserves trees," Briones says. "It shouldn't matter their socioeconomic status. That's what equity is."

This story was originally published by Peninsula Press, a project of Stanford Journalism Program.

Comments

Alan
Registered user
Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Dec 25, 2021 at 10:31 am
Alan, Menlo Park: Belle Haven
Registered user
on Dec 25, 2021 at 10:31 am

What shouldn't get lost on people is that the water table and soil is different in Belle Haven and East Palo Alto than on the other side of 101. It can support more trees than it has now, but smaller trees may do better. The right plants will thrive.


Resident
Registered user
another community
on Dec 27, 2021 at 7:04 am
Resident, another community
Registered user
on Dec 27, 2021 at 7:04 am

East Palo Alto resident here. Dovetailing off the comment about eco system differences between the bay land we live on here and the forested eco systems (west Redwood City) that were, and still are found west of 101, why is Canopy using money and resources to plant trees that are not natural to our eco system and take special care to survive here?

The differences in trees mentioned in the article is just related as “tree canopy” Why not rate the amount of actual trees? I literally have seven trees in my yard. My neighbors have 5 and 3. I see trees in most yards on my daily walks and runs through my neighborhood. Is the “tree canopy” difference based on the fact that most of our trees are lower canopied fruit trees?

Most of mine are, I much prefer having fruit and space to plant vegetables in the summer than having endless shade. My guess is that endless shade may not be the thing most wanted by residents in EPA that the money and people power of Canopy could work on. Especially when our temperature highs of upper 80s are not too intolerable.

Why not go around and do an actual tree count before coming up with plans like this? Canopy differences will be extreme when comparing a forest to a meadow or grassland. Why not use some actual environmental knowledge to back the most sustainable and useful way to address issues instead of cosmetics?

One last thing about my runs and walks. There are very few trees on the bay trail east of 84. Again, a forest is different than bay land. Thank you for your efforts and intent though Canopy


Hmmm
Registered user
another community
on Dec 29, 2021 at 9:40 pm
Hmmm, another community
Registered user
on Dec 29, 2021 at 9:40 pm

I’m here to echo the previous two comments. Also, there’s a visible difference in the canopies - - density and tree type - - on East Palo Alto’s east side (bay side) and the west side. You see this type of difference up and down the Peninsula, often close to both sides of the 101 corridor. It’s super obvious in San Mateo, for example. A lot of the housing rapidly built post-WWII didn’t plant trees along sidewalks, and that’s visible in San Carlos, San Mateo, East Palo Alto, Belle Haven, Belmont.

East Palo Alto was also unincorporated for a long time, and there’s a lot of infrastructure differences and landscape differences that are visible in communities like this. You see similarities in North Fair Oaks, East Palo Alto and Menlo Oaks.

This article does mention landlord neglect of trees and that is a serious and dangerous problem in East Palo Alto. I appreciate Canopy’s work but I also appreciate the previous two comments.


Resident
Registered user
another community
on Jan 2, 2022 at 7:08 pm
Resident , another community
Registered user
on Jan 2, 2022 at 7:08 pm

Seeing that this article is now appearing in the Palo Alto version of this publication, would it be possible for the Almanac/Palo Alto Online reporting staff to quantify the “far fewer trees” mentioned in the title?

In the article, “canopy” differences are the only thing quantified, not the numeric differences in trees. I think the arborists volunteering for Canopy could recognize that even lower canopied trees (as long as they have a trunk) count as trees.

We do have far more bay land than neighboring communities. That must count for something


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.