Sign up for Express
New from the Almanac, Express is an e-edition delivered via email each weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Menlo Park, California Forecast

Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size
State probes lab explosion



Bookmark and Share
As the state opens an independent investigation that could lead to prosecution, Membrane Technology & Research has appealed the seven citations and $55,850 in fines levied by the California Occupational Health and Safety Association (Cal-OSHA) for an accident that killed a 56-year-old scientist in Menlo Park.

On Sept. 2, Adrian Martin reportedly was adding methane to a tank containing methane, nitrogen, helium and butane when the pressurized cylinder exploded, blowing the scientist 15 feet into an adjoining laboratory and killing him. A woman standing near the door of the lab was thrown clear and survived with a damaged eardrum.

The Cal-OSHA inquiry found that the pressure in the tank reached nearly triple the rated safe level. Its pressure relief valve was set to vent only after pressure reached 3,360 psi, about 10 times as high as the cylinder could withstand.

The seven citations include six labeled as "serious." One cites the lab for not doing everything reasonably necessary to protect its employees, in this case, not noting that the tank was only rated for 300 psi.

The lab has retained attorney Jeffrey Tanenbaum of Nixon Peabody LLC. Appeal paperwork filed with Cal-OSHA cites "independent employee action" as a basis for overturning the citations. According to Cal-OSHA, five elements must be proven for the defense to be successful: 1) the employee was experienced in that particular job; 2) the lab has a safety training program; 3) the lab enforces its safety rules; 4) The lab can demonstrate a history of sanctions against employees who violate the safety rules; and 5) the employee knew what the rules were and broke them anyway.

The appeal also challenges the classification of the violations, referring to a section of the state labor code, 6432(c) that says a violation can't be rated "serious" if the employer demonstrates that it "did not know and could not, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, have known of the presence of the violation."

Mr. Tanenbaum said he could not comment while the case was active.

Meanwhile, the state Bureau of Investigations opened its own inquiry in May. The bureau looks into all deaths and serious accidents, according to Cal-OSHA representative Peter Melton, and decides whether to refer a case to a district attorney for prosecution.

Representatives from Membrane Technology, located at 1360 Willow Road, were not available for comment. The lab had no previous record of safety violations, according to OSHA.

Mr. Martin left behind a wife, Livia, and a 17-year-old daughter.


Comments
There are no comments yet for this story.
Be the first!

Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Choose a category: *
Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square!
Please choose a category below that best describes this story.

Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
311 page views
 

AlmanacNews.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.