Town Square

Post a New Topic

Removed barrier frees steelhead to migrate

Original post made on Sep 6, 2013

Representatives of federal, state and local agencies on Thursday announced the elimination of a 105-year-old barrier in a creek between Palo Alto and Menlo Park to allow endangered steelhead trout to migrate upstream from San Francisco Bay.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, September 6, 2013, 12:14 AM

Comments (5)

Posted by MP Resident, a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Sep 6, 2013 at 6:59 am

So this is what all the noise has been about in our neighborhood. What are the two counties/cities, going to do to address erosion of the creek bed walls? This is something that should be looked at, especially along the "s bend" near the Caltrain and pedestrian foot bridges.

Posted by Phil , a resident of another community
on Sep 6, 2013 at 1:39 pm

We love Salmon, bbq in foil is the best. Great news for fishermen!

Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 6, 2013 at 7:57 pm

Steelhead aren't Salmon.

Web Link

Posted by Scratchin-my-head, a resident of another community
on Sep 9, 2013 at 3:24 pm

Looks like a typo in the article: "free to move 40 miles upstream from the bay to spawning and rearing grounds" unless the spawning grounds are the Pacific Ocean or the underground storm pipelines in downtown San Francisco.

Wikipedia's article on San Francisquito Creek Web Link
has a nice map located here: Web Link

which strongly suggests the distance to Searsville Lake would be four (4) miles and not forty (40).

Posted by PT, a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 10, 2013 at 10:10 am

Glad to see coverage of this positive story and project. There are several factual errors and quotes that are not accurate:
Bonde is not the last barrier in the watershed, in fact there are still about a dozen structures that limit or block steelhead migration, the most limiting is Stanford's Searsville Dam which is impassable and blocks over a dozen miles of spawning and rearing habitat.
Bonde was only a partial barrier during lower flows so while it's removal helps access during those flows, it did not block habitat during all flows and it's removal did not open up new habitat.
It also did not improve access to 40 miles of habitat. It improved access to over two dozen miles, but the rest is still blocked by Searsville Dam and other small barriers such as the Bear Gulch Diversion dam on Bear Gulch Creek in Woodside and a couple smaller barriers on Los Trancos Creek and other tributaries. It's great that so many agencies and people are celebrating this project, but it would be nice if they, and the media, accurately reported the story and situation. We still have a ways to go before the last barrier in the watershed is removed or modified for fish passage. Thanks Almanac for ongoing coverage of our creek.

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Palo Alto quietly gets new evening food truck market
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,643 views

See Me. Hear Me. Donít Fix Me.
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,813 views

Universal Language
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 1,399 views

Anglo Menlo Park
By Paul Bendix | 0 comments | 436 views

Council election, and then some.
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 167 views