Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Mar 27, 2013
You would think that the paper products industry would launch a lawsuit against the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors. Remember these are the geniuses that lost over $150 M of the school County schools' money to Lehman Bros. These people are dilettantes and incompetents and have no business being in elected office.
Even in California it would be hard to find a judge that would agree that the Government can tell business how much they should charge for their products. This is unprecedented and is indefensable.
If the the Board of Supes is not stopped its planned metamorphosis to Socialism should be complete in about 20 years. It forgets that it works for us. It is arrogant for the Board to say it is about changing the public's behavior. We, the public need to stand up to these simian dolts and tell them that they work for us and need to change their behavior and be responsive to our needs. Talk about the tail wagging the dog.
County voters recently passed a measure to raise the sales tax. The people want to may more. You can't blame the supervisors for doing the will of the people.
How is this nominal bag fee any different from a tax on gasoline, cigarettes, or any other commodity which brings environmental or social costs? I see absolutely no difference -- it's just new, is all. Not that I'm in favor of an ever-increasing number of such taxes, but bringing your own bags while shopping is a very minor inconvenience, and something more people appear to be doing every month if my observations in Menlo Park are any indication. Mountain out of a molehill, people, and the Socialism claim in a previous comment is just more of the same nonsense we saw in the run-up to last November.
First of all, from what I have witnessed, I do not see plastic bags provided by supermarkets as creating an environmental problem. In our household, for years we have either reused these plastic bags to contain pet waste or deposited them in the supermarkets recycling bin. It is only on a very rare occasion that they have been placed unused in our weekly trashcan. With regard to the requirement for supermarkets to charge a fee, whether $.10 or $.25 for each paper bag, I totally agree with the reasoning and arguments presented by Alan Lambert in his LTE. This fee is punitive and coercive in its very nature and something that should be an embarrassment to those who created or enacted this legislation, whether it be the County staff that recommended it, the County Board of Supervisors and our City Council members that enacted it. This is government at its worst! My response to this legislation and until this legislation in modified, to the greatest extent possible, I intend to change my purchasing so that in the future any purchase of a supermarket product that will generate sales tax revenue will be done outside of my city and county.
The bag fee is not a tax. If it were it would be legal that is if the County got the voters to pass it. But the county didn't go that route because it was persuaded by leftist environmental groups that it would not pass (The one time the left was correct). Instead the Board of Supervisors was coerced into interfering with business commerce. It truly overstepped its bounds. This should be challenged in Court. This is clearly illegal.
The Environmental Left has created hysteria over creeks getting polluted when it was just a minor problem. In the end it strong armed the Board of Supervisors to punish all the residents in unincorporated San Mateo County for the misdeeds of a few.
And the Menlo Park City Council, like a group of lemmings chose to adopt this idiotic ordnance. I expected this of Kirsten and Ray as they have higher ambitions within the Democratic Party and need support from the Left. So they chose to sacrifice the good of Menlo Park in furtherance of their political careers. What else is new. Rich Cline, normally a common sense guy, made a mistake and can be forgiven. However, Peter Ohtaki knew better but he betrayed the base that got him elected because is is loathes confrontation. Ohtaki is truly a shrinking violet. Only Cat Carleton try to introduce some common sense into the equation.
By the way, I just purchased 2000 plastic bags for $45.00. These multiple use plastic bags will be used the first time at the grocery store and will have secondary uses for lining bathroom waste cans and for pet product disposal. I don't know anyone who doesn't have secondary uses for the grocery plastic bags.
@Mike, good as you profess to be in your efforts to reuse and recycle, millions or billions of these plastic bags end up in landfills every year, the same fate awaiting your pet waste-laden bags, presumably. Plastic bags are an environmental problem, plain and simple. And leaving the county to do your shopping is simply not a rational response to the bag fee, unless you enjoy paying far more for gas and additional gas taxes monthly than you ever would for the dozens of paper bags you might use (to say nothing of the added environmental cost your longer drive would entail). You'd also further penalize local merchants, which doesn't appear to be your intent.
If this issue is as important to you as your comment suggests, write a letter to the Almanac and the BoS, or find some other productive way to express your disapproval. For my part I think people need to be coerced into shopping with their own reusable bags -- it's good for the environment and good for merchants, who needn't bear the cost of the bags or pass part or all of that cost on to consumers.
Robert's is going to see a significant uptick in its business. However merchants, if they choose, could give a 1% Customer Loyalty discount for shopping to everyone to counteract that idiocy put in play by the Board of Supes. Libs could not do anything about it because the discount would be given to everyone including those who bring their e coli laden reusable bags.
Does anyone recall the art installation in Palo Alto that featured huge bocce-style balls made of plastic bags? It was an outdoor installation right near the lawn bowling court on Embarcadero in Palo Alto. The artist and students collected THOUSANDS of *local* plastic bags for this project.
It's pretty easy to buy eco-friendly plastic bags for pet waste & reusable shopping bags. Even here in EPA we can afford them.
Using the same logic that was used to ban plastic bags, city counsils could ban virtually any product. Instead of paper newspapers, let's only allow electronic newspapers to reduce waste. Instead of paper cups at Starbucks, let's require everyone to bring a reuseable mug. The list is endless and each one would result in in incrimental environmental benefit. However, do we really want the city counsil telling us what (otherwise legal) products we should and shouldn't use? If the city counsils are going to reshape society using their view of what's right and wrong, they have a lot more work to do. Question is do we really want them making such decisions for us?
I'm with Gern. This is a molehill being exaggerated into a mountain. I've been re-using Trader Joe's bags for years and it's really not a big deal. In fact, I much prefer them to the regular bags that Safeway provides, which lack the handles.
I know that some want to make this a left/right, liberal/conservative argument but being pro-environment should not be a partisan issue. I know that in many ways the environment that I'm leaving my kids and grandkids is in much worse shape than what I inherited - California's cleaner air being one notable exception. It makes me sad & ashamed that personal selfishness or ideological blinders would keep us from doing something to make the world a more livable place for all God's creatures - especially something like this that costs so little.
Paper bags, plastic bags, I don't really care because I can use either one responsibly. That said, paper bags are probably better for the environment. What bothers me is this stupid idea of paying $0.10/bag at checkout. Bags have always been provided by businesses so that customers can take their purchases home in a safe and convenient manner. It's always has been an accepted cost of doing business. Tacking on this ridiculous fee just creates more paperwork and slows things down at the register. A transaction can't be completed because the number of bags required can't be determined until everything's been bagged before it can be added to your final bill. The cost of this inconvenience in accounting alone is probably greater than the monies collected. Whoever thought of this idea should think about getting a real job instead of wasting everybody's time and effort. Paper bags? Fine. $0.10/bag? Go soak your head!
I don't follow your argument. If you use recycled bags you owe nothing so there's nothing to add to the bill. If you forget to bring them then leave change to cover the cost of the bags you use. It doesn't have to be so complicated.
The paper-bag theory may be practical for people shopping for one or two persons who visit their store of choice every day or two. If you are shopping for a family once a week (which saves fuel costs, of course) it becomes a little ridiculous to anticipate "how many bags do I need to take with me on my trip and into the store?" Gads! Numerous bags fill up the cart and get in your way as you attempt to gather your items into the cart. And if you go to another store, you've likely already used up your bag inventory for the day.
In addition, the time and effort of the check-out personnel no doubt costs the merchants more than the income from the bags. This is a lose-lose situation.
What you describe is not my experience at all.
I shop for my family of four once a week, doing as much shopping at Trader Joe's as possible, then filling in the gaps at Safeway.
I take two bundles of five bags (folded and bound with rubber bands) so I have bags for each store. Each bundle stays neatly out of the way while I shop, stuffed in the gap on the side of the fold-out basket/child seat in the shopping cart. When I go to check out, the bundle is the first thing I put on the conveyor belt so the clerk knows to use them for bagging, rather than the default plastic bags.
Because the paper bags hold so much more than plastic and because they remain upright when filled, filling a paper bag and then transferring it to the shopping cart goes much more quickly than using plastic. Ditto in transferring the bags of groceries from the cart to my car trunk.
Because I use Trader Joe's bags, which have handles, it's a breeze carrying them from the car into the kitchen. Even fully loaded with canned goods, I can always carry two bags at time. If they're light or partially loaded I can carry 3 or 4 at a time.
Once home, I empty the bags, refold them and bind them with rubber bands so they're all ready for the next week's shopping.
PS. I've learned to keep a couple spare bags in the trunk for the spur-of-the-moment shopping trip.
Steve- re Calif environment - cheer up! We've made great strides in the past 40 years, especial here in the Bay Area. The bay is mcj cleaner than it used to be. Composting & recycling are common, home gardening is on the upswing, we have fewer wasteful lawns, more focus on native plant preservation & successful, well-organized clean ups for waterways. There's still much to do & Sili Valley has created a mess & San Joaquin Valley is a pollution horror show. But for the size of the state & it's population, we could be much worse off. Now if we can clear the oceans of those huge, terrifying messes of garbage, the planet will be better off. And you know, do more about climate change...but we're pretty far gone that way.
Nanny state as usual.V
The whole issue of bags is supposedly based on being able to recycle. So why in the world are they trying to prevent the use of paper bags? The last time I checked paper bags recycle quite nicely into the environment - they decompose and are compostable! And almost all are made from recycled paper and wood products!
Me thinks we should be composting our crazy local politicians as it's highly questionable that they're worth the "two bits" to be able to reuse them.
Re-use comes before recycle.
If you just use a paper bag once, then that means trees and energy need to be used and water polluted to produce it's replacement. If you shop each week, that's 52X the amount of trees, energy and polluted water that needs to be generated. Not to mention the added cost to your grocery bill for this "convenience". And then there's the cost in energy to recycle all these bags that you dispose of.
Re-using the bags is really not any hassle, once you get in the habit of doing it.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Freebirds Palo Alto shutters, Pieology to move in
By Elena Kadvany | 12 comments | 3,126 views
A Glimpse into local HS Suicide
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 2,170 views
Deny the 429 Univ Ave Project Appeal
By Steve Levy | 7 comments | 1,309 views
Now Playing - Your Dinner!
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 917 views
Water War & Peace
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 310 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 The Almanac
All rights reserved.