Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Feb 3, 2013
It is quite troubling that there are so many complainers about that choose to criticize Stanford for just about anything and everything that the University does.
Perhaps these people should stop and think what the local environment would be like if the University had never been created and the Stanford lands had been sold off in a manner similar to the balance of the lands abutting the foothills up and down the peninsula.
Let's hypothesize the non Stanford environment:
*Solid housing development from El Camino in Palo Alto all the way up to Skyline punctuated by cheesy strip malls and dime a dozen retail establishments just as along much of the balance of the peninsula would displace a large area of open space- certainly exacerbating downstream flooding issues too.
*The Silicon Valley miracle of innovation and creativity would not exist here - if at all.
*A world class medical facility might not exist anywhere nearby.
*Sales tax revenue from perhaps one of the country's most pleasant shopping centers would not exist to benefit Palo ALto.
*A vibrant community of technology, creativity, and the arts would be lacking.
AND - Most of all YOU wouldn't have a common target to complain about.
Certainly there is a cost associated with the benefits we enjoy from Stanford's presence. There is traffic associated with the Med Center, the shopping center, and the university albeit probably significantly less than if the land had been developed in a manner similar to other parts of the peninsula.
Stanford does source water for irrigation from both Corte Madera Creek and Lost Trancos Creek but certainly far less than if the entire area were developed and drawing water resources from the Hetch Hetchy system.
The Searsville dam problem and possible solutions is not nearly as simple as simply chopping a hole in the dam and letting nature take its course. There are a host of issues ranging from how to handle the years of sediment accumulation to the risks associated with an increased possibility of downstream flooding in Palo Alto and Menlo Park.
Perhaps those who chose to resort to the courts to complain but without a well considered solution should be given an opportunity.
Let the judge award them the RESPONSIBILITY to devise a solution that embraces the needs and aspirations of all of the parties involved including Stanford's - along with the responsibility to finance the execution of such a plan AND the liability associated with other aggrieved parties if the solution should fail to satisfy all parties or not result in the expected outcomes.
Are any of the plaintiffs ready to step up to the plate??
@Stan - While your very creative and presumptive rant is entertaining, it is simply void of reality or relevance.
You are right Stan. Without Leland Stanford's thought's regarding the future of Stanford Land's in his will, there wouldn't be a Jasper Ridge Preserve as we know it. Present day lawyers have to try and find loop holes in order to chip away at what's left of the beauty you enjoy around Stanford.
I'm pretty sure if he were alive, he would want to correct the harm that has been going on for so long at Searsville Dam. He may have fished salmon and steelhead down around the 3rd hole of the golf course himself, back in the day, when salmon and steelhead were taken for granted as they were pretty much everywhere.
I agree with Stan 100%!
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
It Can Wait
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 2,754 views
Hit the Bus
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 328 views
“I live near Sunset”
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 49 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2014 The Almanac
All rights reserved.