Town Square

Post a New Topic

California high-speed-rail battle will now be fought 'outside legislative chambers'

Original post made on Jul 20, 2012

California's contentious drive to build a high-speed-rail system between San Francisco and Los Angeles sped ahead July 6, when state lawmakers approved funding for the first construction phase. But the $68 billion project still has to pass through a gauntlet of legal, financial and political obstacles before it becomes reality.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, July 19, 2012, 9:14 AM

Comments (6)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Morris Brown
a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Jul 20, 2012 at 1:10 am

For those interested, the lawsuit filed by Mike Brady, it can be view on the court's website

Web Link

You fill in the Case # of 2011-00113919






 +   Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Jul 20, 2012 at 8:13 am

Kind of important.

But the bill also states that the $1.1 billion can be transferred to other items, including construction in the Central Valley (known in the bill as Item 2665-306-6043), with approval from the state Department of Finance.

"It looks like accounting minutiae, but if you translate it, it means that with one signature from a governor appointee, the money for Caltrain can be moved to the Central Valley project," Ms. Alexis said.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by john burrows
a resident of another community
on Jul 20, 2012 at 11:59 am

So the vote was 21-20. How did that happen? I wonder if Martin Engel, Morris Brown, Mr. Brady, and Stuart Flashman could have quietly entered the Senate chamber and voted "no" when no one was looking.

My impression was that the vote was 21-16 with 4 Democrats voting against and 3 Republicans wimping out and not voting at all.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Morris Brown
a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Jul 20, 2012 at 1:20 pm

@ Michael G. Stogner

The language in the bill was a bit confusing; it was clarified in the Leno hearing, upon being questioned by Senator Alquest

Bottom line, is, the money as appropriated in the Trailer bill, cannot be moved to the Central Valley. Satisfy yourself by viewing this 4 minutes of that meeting.

Web Link

@ john burrows. The vote was 21 to 16. Indeed 3 republicans did not vote. Four Democrat Senators voted no -- Simitian, Lowenthal, DeSaulnier and Pavley.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Jul 20, 2012 at 6:32 pm

Morris,

Thank you for that link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by GOLLY
a resident of another community
on Jul 20, 2012 at 9:45 pm


The TITANIC really did sink in 1912......you must believe.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 2,438 views

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,099 views

One night only: ‘Occupy the Farm’ screening in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,997 views

What Are Menlo Park’s Priorities?
By Erin Glanville | 36 comments | 1,398 views

Water Torture
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 449 views