Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jun 22, 2012
Hmm? I hope business is okay for the MP Su Hong and it's not too long before it reopens. I hadn't realized that the Palo Alto Su Hong was not under the same ownership. That explains some of the differences.
I used to like Chef Chu's in Los Altos, but it's food has slipped in quality and too often it is over-run by badly behaved kids. Family friendly should not mean that anything goes.
Is it me or isn't it a bit weird for Su Hong to close so suddenly "for remodeling?" True remodeling is usually well planned - this isn't a very good sign.
Too bad. The last thing we need is another empty store front in our central business corridor!
This sounds more like the chinese restaurant that occupied the building Left Bank now occupies. Can't remember the name, but they suddenly "closed for remodeling," only to never reopen. Turned out they had litany of health code violations and they couldn't afford to fix them so they went out of business. I knew a contractor that did work on the building afterwards and he told me the kitchen conditions were disgusting. Made me regret eating there.
MV - I recall that place - we used to go there when we were kids & it did close suddenly. I had the same thought when I heard Su Hong closed for remodeling - health code violations. To Go seems to still be doing a brisk business. I also heard that their General's Chicken had improved recently.
Pat - I agree re Chef Chu's. But their hotpot basil beef is still marvelous. My neighbor beats the kid issue by going there for lunch instead of dinner - certainly not possible for everyone. Did you see Chef Chu's featured recently on Check Please! Bay Area?
The county health department posts restaurants' health-code violations online, and Su Hong received a rating of 'good' in a May inspection. There is no evidence that the restaurant was shut down for health-code violations.
Renee - great update. Nice to see some facts stopping unfounded and harmful speculation.
Harmful speculation? Prove it. You love to constantly accuse others' of actions that YOU think they are guilty of. Su Hong not showing much concern for their customers is what causes speculation.
"Harmful speculation? Prove it."
" I had the same thought when I heard Su Hong closed for remodeling - health code violations."
You consider that harmful? Interesting. Pretty interesting coming from a commenter who was inflaming on a thread about kids on restricted licenses.
If a local business can't plan to be more considerate to their customers, then speculation will happen. It's nice that it was clarified here, but speculation will continue since they closed so suddenly and many won't read this article.
"You consider that harmful?"
Yes, suggesting that a specific business was operating improperly without any evidence to that effect is VERY different than offering an opinion on the ability of a generic class of young drivers.
Yes, parents who allow their kids to violate the restrictions are the ones you felt entitled to ask if they approved of rape and murder. I call that harmful.
Su Hong will be closed for at least two months, according to an employee. Maybe the "closed for remodeling" is real, maybe not. Only time will tell. Either way, there will be speculation from customers since the owner's lack of notification took them by surprise. That's potentially harmful.
I know a family who were coming from various parts of the Bay Area to have dinner there last night and had to make other plans. I work with one of them and she wondered if remodeling was the real reason. We get catered food from there regularly and found it odd nothing was mentioned ahead of time. Strange.
Has anyone checked to see if the city issued any building permits regarding this remodel?
That could be an indicator that there is indeed a remodel project planned or underway.
I think the restaurant that closed was called Yuen Yung. They were in the Left Bank space, which was previously a movie theater, and before that it was the BofA.
"Yes, parents who allow their kids to violate the restrictions are the ones you felt entitled to ask if they approved of rape and murder. I call that harmful."
You intentionally misstated my position. Here is exactly what I posted:
Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of Atherton, on Jun 13, 2012 at 8:14 pm
Peter Carpenter is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online
"we simply told her when we found out, "If you do it you will face the fines, etc. Just drive safely so you won't have a reason to get pulled over."
Sorry, but that is NOT responsible parenting. What you are saying is that it is OK to break the law but just don't get caught. To you have the same position on drugs, rape, murder, tax evasion, etc.?
Give it up Peter. You spell it potatoe, I spell it potato. We're sure to see you at Su Hong if they reopen.
waterbug - just stay on topic and you will be fine.
Yes. Potatoe vs potato. Mr. Carpenter is demonstrating some immaturity here because he disagrees. Ah, that slippery slope in parenting from breaking driving laws to rape, drug dealing and murder. It's like wondering if a restaurant's owner is telling the truth about its temporary closure or if something else is going on to us harming the business. I just wish I had that much power. Perhaps Peter does.
[Post removed. Please discuss the topic and avoid attacking other posters.]
I know it is hard, but just stay on topic and you will be fine.
If they put out a sign saying when they were closing, their business would probably decline. Would you want to eat at a restaurant on their last night of businees? I have heard people decline to go to a restaraunt in that situation because they might be trying to clean out all their old food and not using fresh ingredients.
Weird. Peter's pretty off topic here, but still trying to police the behavior of others.
If/when Su Hong reopens, I'm sure it'll still be a popular eatery. Since their To Go is open, the suffering from going without favorite dishes is minimized.
Well, no sign of workers remodeling Su Hong, no reopen date posted. I say it's closed until further notice. Good to have Phil's Treasure Pot in lieu of SH.
boy that renovation takes a long time!...could they be closed forever?????????
It's been 8 months since they "closed for remodeling." Unless they are planning some major change that requires some serious engineering and planning variances they could have had the plans drawn up, submitted, approved and built in that period of time. They're not remodeling. They're out of business.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Engagement Rings: Myths and Options
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 9,921 views
Opening alert: Go Fish Poke Bar in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 5,890 views
It's President's Day. Why Not Butter Up the Boss?
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,767 views
Checklist before baby arrives
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 454 views
Common Application's 2017-2018 Essay Prompts
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 348 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Express / Weekend Express
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2017 The Almanac
All rights reserved.