Post a New Topic
Original post made
on May 17, 2012
Very convenient. The city is "forced" to go on this housing binge just as it was about to disband its Housing Department and layoff 3 city staff members. Hmm.
1975 housing units is way too many housing units to be adding to an area the size of Menlo Park.
Also, I am not going to take on a life savings worth of debt to live in a condo or townhouse development with BMR in it. The HOA fees are $1000 or so for the non-BMR residents in the complex near the train station where I believe the city is still paying off the mortgage of a BMR place they had to take over because the woman defaulted on the mortgage and lived rent free for several months. This is in addition to having to pay property taxes at least 2 to 3 times what others in the community are now paying. It's just does not make sense, and it is not fair to keep constantly throwing the financial burdens of past guilts or excesses on the next generation, in this case the next generation of homeowners.
Menlo should be ashamed for not having met state requirements for 20 years, if what the lawsuit states is true. Now the catch up will be painful in every way possible.
1975 units is a lot for a city the size of Menlo.
Gov't out of control - it's interesting the commenters keep using this one example over & over again of the woman who defaulted. It's time that we hear a more balanced view of affordable housing - both successes & failures.
Here in Palo Alto, it's worth noting that the city has yet to even submit a housing element to the Dept. of Housing & Community Development (Web Link), so I think it advisable that PA staff, planning commissioners, and yes, the city council, stay abreast of developments in MP.
I hope Menlo adopts the agreement.
Public Advocates has an excellent track record in this area.
Check out the Pleasanton agreement.
Town's Plan to Cap Residential Growth Violates State Law
Web Link, and a column on it: Residential Growth Cap Overruling Could Reshape California
Why did this organization sue MP? Why not PA, Atherton, Los Altos Hills, Woodside??
The organizations were concerned that Facebook employees would displace current tenants living in relatively affordable homes in Belle Haven. The city was so thrilled by the honor of being anointed by Facebook that it blew off all such objections. The only legal leverage the groups had was the housing element, so that was the basis of their suit. Ironic enough, it's unlikely that this settlement will produce even one new additional affordable unit of rental housing.
Behind the backstory is the truth that Menlo has been dodging their legal responsibility for many years. Facebook just pushed that to the forefront and it's taken the collective groups to show that Menlo lost its integrity in this area a long time ago.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Freebirds Palo Alto shutters, Pieology to move in
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 2,671 views
"Itís Not About the Nail"
By Chandrama Anderson | 4 comments | 1,905 views
Deny the 429 Univ Ave Project Appeal
By Steve Levy | 5 comments | 1,044 views
Now Playing - Your Dinner!
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 807 views
Water War & Peace
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 264 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 The Almanac
All rights reserved.