Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of the Atherton: Lindenwood neighborhood, on Apr 19, 2011 at 10:42 am
Bob is so right - consolidation is the answer. Someday taxpayers will demand it, until then the schools will cut everything but administration and blame the taxpayers for not approving more parcel taxes.
Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of the Atherton: Lindenwood neighborhood, on Apr 19, 2011 at 11:06 am
Don't confuse efficiency with profits. It IS possible for public agencies to be efficient without infusing into them the profit motive.
The key is to make public agencies understand that they have a fixed budget and therefore they must accomplish their mission within that budget - even if it means merging with other agencies with a similar mission.
No need to throw out the baby with the bath water.
Posted by Jack Hickey, a resident of the Woodside: Emerald Hills neighborhood, on May 16, 2011 at 11:41 am
Thomas, cutting the school day down to 3 hours would require a change in State Law. A 4 hour day would be possible. And, if teacher compensation was reduced to reflect the shorter work day, no layoffs would be necessary. An added benefit to society would accrue from students who choose to use their new free time in productive labor.
The opportunity cost of education in schools is too high. There is much to be learned outside the walls of those institutions.
Posted by Jack for Office, a resident of the Woodside: Mountain Home Road neighborhood, on May 29, 2011 at 1:25 am
I am for eat what you kill. In other words, if you're not paying your fair share of taxes than you shouldn't be benefiting. But, that's how things are so I am okay with the these wonderful cuts made by Gov. Brown. I hope they keep coming so that the schools can squeeze out the fat. Keep cutting Uncle Brown, it will eventually cause enough people to call for consolidation and really make changes. Too many self serving school districts who are poorly managed and not serving their communities. It's ridculous to let these redundant administrators sit there with fat pay checks pretending to be needed. Than they go into meetings with there yes men/women pitching the world is falling down to keep their gravy train running. You people are fools to let it continue.
Posted by Jack for Office, a resident of the Woodside: Mountain Home Road neighborhood, on Jun 2, 2011 at 9:27 pm
Unsustainabble is when the tax dollars and easy parcel tax dollars and dot.com easy stupid money go dry and you have administrators blame everything else but themselves for the shortage in funding...just like their "buddy" politicians. You have educated white democratics pushing to save everyone who doesn't pay their share scrambling to save their white rich basica aid school districts. Now that's irony.
Posted by Leon Foonman, a resident of the Woodside: other neighborhood, on Jun 16, 2011 at 12:40 pm
Nice to see that Grover Norquist's acolytes are here leaving the usual "we hate anything public" crap.
These are the same people whose parents made sure they paid enough into the public schools so they would be better educated than 80& of the world. Now that they have "made it" and have all those big TVs, SUVs and other material needs, they are opposed to the concept of paying anything out that would benefit their children or any one else's kids.
Their own private greed and selfishness is well suited to the Tea Party mentality of the Republican anti-tax movement. They prefer to send their kids to private schools or charters that are run by the "charter school" tax money re-allocation movement.
Look around people, at your priorities, and think about what it will mean for your kids future. If you are one of the Wealthiest 2%, then no problem, your kids won't have to look for a job, but the other 98% will need to support themselves with an actual job or career. Without the right skills and preparation, they won't even be able to support themselves, let alone a family. Reap what you sew America, you are planting the seeds of decline and poverty by starving the schools.
Better to pay for a good education than to pay for incarcerating the ones who won't have any options....
Who is killing America? The GOP and all the voters who support their oppressors.
Posted by POGO, a resident of the Woodside: other neighborhood, on Jun 16, 2011 at 4:54 pm
Yes, Leon, it's all about the kids, right? The only thing you forgot to add was that Republicans want to throw granny over a cliff. Maybe next time.
I can only speak for myself, of course, but my issue isn't "starving" the public schools so I can send my kid's to private schools (like I attended). First, I am a product of the public schools - from first grade through high school graduation. I also attended both state and private college and graduate schools. Same is true for my children.
My issue is the "gold-plated" compensation, benefit and pension plans that our public employees enjoy. Put simply, they are no longer affordable. I just read an article in The Post that said the AVERAGE salary at Sequoia Union High School district was $97,000 a year - and that's for 10 months work (I think the equivalent of $120,000 is pretty good pay by anyone's standards). Other public employees pay little or nothing into their pension plans and receive as much as 90% of their salary and full health care benefits for the rest of their lives.
I do not know a single company in the private sector with those kinds of pay or benefits. There's a reason for that, they aren't market terms and they aren't sustainable. We're finding out that they aren't sustainable when we read about public employees layoffs and shutting down services. THERE SIMPLY ISN'T ANY MONEY.
So we can keep up this charade as we drive off a financial cliff or we can face the fact that our public employee system has gotten way out of wack and needs a recalibration.
Instead of criticizing those who call for reasonable reform, you should embrace it or have the integrity to offer an alternative.
Posted by POGO, a resident of the Woodside: other neighborhood, on Jun 18, 2011 at 3:56 pm
I am checking but The Post does not post it's articles on line. I sent an email to their editor for clarification.
I did say "salary," but the article may have said "compensation" which would include stipends and incentives. If you read that contract, you know those incentives are quite significant and can add several thousand dollars to a teacher's compensation.