Town Square

Post a New Topic

Serious concerns about timing of budget surplus disclosure

Original post made by Renee Batti on Feb 21, 2007

The following letter by Susan Carnahan was published in the Almanac's Feb. 21 print edition:

Editor:
The action by the new 4-1 majority on the Menlo Party City Council (Boyle opposed) to approve the maximum Utility User Tax in light of the newly revealed $3.7 million budget surplus is not only disappointing; it suggests that the majority of our City Council is not willing to investigate this issue.
Serious concerns have become evident about the timing of the disclosure of the surplus and when city management not only knew there would be a surplus, but knew the size of the surplus. Failure to promptly disclose the existence of a projected surplus or accurately respond to council questioning on this matter at an October meeting is disturbing.
I voted for Measure K, after relying on statements in the Measure K literature, which were repeated in phone campaigns by both the League of Women Voters and the Measure K campaign, that Menlo Park faced continued deficits and drastic cuts in services or jobs. I have no doubt that these groups thought both statements were true at the time.
Polls taken before the campaign said the UTT would fail if employee retirement benefits were raised. The majority of the council just approved a contract raising those benefits, by percent, starting in 2009.
Rather than simply approving the maximum UTT, the City Council should undertake an independent investigation into when city management knew a budget surplus would exist and why they kept results of the October 6 audit report, which listed the $3.7 surplus, a secret from the City Council, the voters of Menlo Park, and the groups who were supporting
Measure K.
I would also like full disclosure on what these one-time savings are that are reputed to have caused the surplus.
The UTT rates approved by the City Council last week should be rescinded and an investigation into the deception of the voters of Menlo Park should be instigated.
Susan Carnahan
Rosefield Way, Menlo Park

Comments

There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Touring the Southern California “Ivies:” Pomona and Cal Tech
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 5 comments | 2,677 views

Chai Brisket
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,896 views

Sometimes "I'm Sorry" Doesn't Cut It
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 1,059 views

Couples: Parallel Play or Interactive Play?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,041 views

Getting High in Menlo Park
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 688 views