Almanac editorial: Renew Portola Valley utility tax
Original post made by News Guy on Oct 23, 2009
For those who volunteer and work for Portola Valley's town government, passage of Measures P, Q and R in the Nov. 3 election is viewed as absolutely necessary if the town is to maintain its current level of services.
The measures reauthorizes the town's 24-year-old utility tax that costs the average homeowner about $250 a year. The 4.5 percent assessment on utilities, including gas, electric and water, would be used to keep the government running, while income from an additional 2 percent tax would be funneled into the town's fund to purchase open space.
The tax is opposed by Ed Wells, the town's first treasurer, and some of his fellow conservatives, who say the town has plenty of money and could easily survive without the tax income, a case he makes in the adjoining guest opinion.
But regardless of Mr. Wells' numbers, the town's budget director and top administrator, as well as council members and former mayors, disagree, and say his analysis is a sham that mixes budget numbers with actual income.
We support town officials on this one, and urge Portola Valley residents to vote yes on Measures P, Q and R (a vote for all three is necessary to pass both measures) and continue to support their government in this relatively painless way.
Smitten Ice Cream on its way to Los Altos Whole Foods
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 956 views
A Perspective on Surf Air Approaches to San Carlos
By Stuart Soffer | 17 comments | 911 views
Common Core And The Literary Classics: Supplementing Our Kids Education (By An Avowed Jane Austenophile)
By Erin Glanville | 6 comments | 860 views