Town Square

Post a New Topic

Committee recommends splitting Menlo Park in county redistricting move

Original post made on Sep 25, 2013

Menlo Park would be split into two San Mateo County supervisorial districts under all three possible redistricting maps an advisory committee has forwarded to the Board of Supervisors, which is scheduled to make a decision on district boundaries on Oct. 8.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, September 25, 2013, 11:42 AM

Comments (4)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Christopher L. Bowman
a resident of another community
on Sep 25, 2013 at 2:23 pm

Barbara: As the line-drawer for the "Equity" plan, I want to thank you for a generally thorough and objective account of last night's hearing. One correction though. Prop B didn't win narrowly but by a greater than 58% to 42% vote. In Presidential elections, that margin would be called a substantial win or even a land-slide.

While looking at the three plans that were recommended by the advisory committee for consideration by the Board, from a county-wide standpoint, you are correct that there are only slight variations between the plans, but they do differ as to where Menlo Park is split. The Community Unity Plan 4c draws the line at El Camino, with 41% of Menlo Park in District 3 and 59% in District 4. Nakamura's Plan 1G draws the line at Middlefield Road, with 56% of Menlo Park in District 3 and 44% retained in District 4. The Equity map draws the line at the East Palo Alto city limits between the county line and Willow Road, with nearly 75% of Menlo Park in District 3 and 25% kept in District 4. The neighborhoods of the Flood Tract and Belle Haven (East Menlo Park) would remain in their current district, along with East Palo Alto, North Fair Oaks, and all of Redwood City, and San Carlos and Belmont east of the Caltrain tracks to balance for population.

The plans also vary on how South San Francisco, which is severely divided currently between Districts 1 and 5, with only 52% of the City in District 1 thus having a smaller number of residents in that district than those of San Bruno is divided. The Nakamura plan reduces South San Francisco's percentage in District 1 to 48%, while the Community Unity plan increases it to 58%, and the Equity plan increases it to 78%.

The Community Unity and and Nakamura plans don't split as many cities as the Equity plan does, but the Equity plan reduces the impact of such splits by ensuring that no more than 24% of any city ends up in another district than where the majority of the city residents are assigned. By so doing, their electoral influence is not significantly diluted as South San Francisco's is under the current plan.

Sincerely,

Christopher L. Bowman


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jess Hansen
a resident of another community
on Sep 25, 2013 at 3:11 pm

Wow! Pretty ridiculous for Bill Nack of the Building Trades Council to have a seat on this advisory board at all when he fought tooth and nail against by-district elections. Now apparently we're supposed to have confidence that despite fighting against it he's going to give the process the care and attention it deserves?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Renee Batti
news editor of The Almanac
on Sep 25, 2013 at 4:29 pm

Renee Batti is a registered user.

Christopher Bowman is correct in pointing out that Proposition B didn't win narrowly, but by a large margin. The story has been corrected.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Susan Smith
a resident of Woodside School
on Sep 25, 2013 at 7:57 pm

West Menlo's Dream come true: to be part of Woodside, Portola Valley and Atherton and less close to Fair Oaks....what a load....all the $$$$$$ and power in one district...cheers to the committee....


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

To Cambodia With Love
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 3,455 views

Life in fast forward
By Jessica T | 3 comments | 1,683 views

Medical
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,650 views

My Morning Off
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,202 views

Its Not About The Officer Or The MomIts About All Of Us
By Erin Glanville | 9 comments | 839 views