Posted by Give it a rest, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Jan 30, 2013 at 10:42 am
I guess the Almanac got tired of beating up on the Atherton police department (for awhile) and is now moving on to the Menlo Park police department.
See any commonality here? These guys just don't like law enforcement.
The laws on the book protecting police confidentiality are designed for the protection of citizens. Criminals would love to retaliate against cops by obtaining every minor compliant made against them to try to use with a jury to get out from under their own criminal acts.
We all get this. The Almanac doesn't.
Editor's note: The editorial makes it clear that we are seeking data, but not identifying information: "Reporter Sandy Brundage made it clear in her request to the city that she wasn't seeking any identifying information, which the city would be unable to provide legally because of laws protecting the privacy of public employees, particularly police officers."
Posted by Grand Jury, a resident of the Woodside: other neighborhood, on Jan 30, 2013 at 10:59 am
This sounds eactly like the sort of thing the San Mateo County Grand Jury should be investigating. We pay the taxes that make the Menlo Park Police exist and allow for pensions....We should be entitled to the information.
Posted by Lurker, a resident of another community, on Jan 30, 2013 at 12:22 pm
Look, the problem stems from the fact that the current San Mateo District Attorney - unlike many DA's in the country - is thick as thieves with ALL San Mateo County law enforcement and that his first inclination is to cover and protect them when they get into trouble. Take the incident involving Sheriff Greg Munks. Both Wagstaffe and then DA Fox came to his defense after he was found at the house for underaged prostitutes in Las Vegas. We all saw the weirdly fawning emails Wagstaffe wrote to Munks after he broke the law. If that had happened in say, LA, or Seattle or Boston, the press would have called for Wagstaffe and Jim Fox's heads, as well as Munks'
There's no oversight committee to review the culture of secrecy fostered both by police departments and the DA's office when crimes have been committed by officers.
The Almanac was fortunate that one of their reporters happened to overhear the incident involving Vasquez. Are there crimes committed by police officers in San Mateo County that have been hushed up ? Hypothetically, what if a police officer in San Mateo had raped a citizen but the public never got to hear about it?
Posted by Lurker, a resident of another community, on Jan 30, 2013 at 12:44 pm
To Grand Jury: I wouldn't get your hopes up about the Grand Jury doing anything.
Five years ago, I was asked by the San Mateo Grand Jury to donate all sorts of documentation for a problem they were investigating. Then they invited me to speak in person. After I spoke, they agreed that the problem was "an outrage" . But they copped out and said that the problem was not in their jurisdiction. Some on the grand jury had personal connections to the people who were part of the problem they were investigating.
There aren't a ton of people in slumbering San Mateo County who will make the effort and stand up and do the right thing at this point.
This needs to be investigated by an entity outside San Mateo County.
Posted by Robert, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Jan 30, 2013 at 1:59 pm
Well of course they didn't provide the information. The police in Menlo Park are too busy verbally abusing teenagers and having sex with prostitutes to waste their time on silly things like filling out paperwork.
Posted by Skeptic, a resident of the Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park neighborhood, on Jan 30, 2013 at 2:34 pm
I'm sure that if the personnel department really had to compile those statistics, it might cost some staff hours. But does anyone really believe those statistics don't exist already? Can our paid public city hall managers really not keep track of personnel matters this important? Sorry, I don't buy it.
Posted by Blue Collusion, a resident of the Menlo Park: Fair Oaks neighborhood, on Jan 30, 2013 at 6:58 pm
Clearly, there is a conspiracy of self-protection within the entire Law Enforcement community, not just Menlo Park. How many tales of police corruption and covering-up for each other have been in the news lately? I count many! This should stop, but it won't under the current Grand Jury and self-police conspiracy. Good for the Almanac to bring this out . . shame on the other area newspapers for helping to cover it up. Atherton, Woodside, CHP . . you know what I'm talking about! :-(
Posted by Response, a resident of the Portola Valley: other neighborhood, on Feb 16, 2013 at 12:44 pm
In response to Lurker, Sandy Brundage deserves credit for actually visiting Menlo Park. Other that Vanessa from Patch, reporters are more likely to phone in the story after watching council meetings online.
Today's Post reported the naked cop made $162,800 in 2012, even though he was demoted. Although the prostitute was arrested on the spot, MPPD Detective Tim Brackett escorted the naked cop home without any jail time. Tim Brackett was promoted in 2011 (after screwing up this case along with Matt Bacon[portion removed]), but Brackett only made $160,823 in 2012... about $2,000 less than the naked cop. All of these bozos work for Lacey Burt, who recently retired... shortly after getting a raise in the consent calendar... but she's still on the payroll.
The city manger needs to step up a set an example. Time to clean house at MPPD. Tim Bracket needs to be fired/retired along with the naked cop. [Portion removed]