Town Square

Post a New Topic

Measure M - No EIR, No public hearings, No traffic study

Original post made by Peter Carpenter, Atherton: Lindenwood, on Sep 3, 2014

Voters need to know that there was NO EIR done on Measure M, there were NO public hearings and NO traffic study. And the Measure M supporters refuse to discuss what might be the consequences of Measure M forcing owners of adjacent properties to develop those properties separately and in an uncoordinated manner. Measure M supporters refuse to discuss the consequences of encouraging property owners to develop large 3 and 4 bedrooms residential units since only office uses are restricted under the measure.

Without an EIR, without public hearings, without a traffic study voters should simply vote NO on M.

Comments (2)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Sep 4, 2014 at 7:03 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Here is a great quote from a Measure M supporter:

"I will not be hurt if M fails. I just hope it gets enough votes to send the message."


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 4, 2014 at 7:50 pm

Menlo Voter is a registered user.

"I will not be hurt if M fails. I just hope it gets enough votes to send the message."

brilliant


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


To post your comment, please click here to Log in

Remember me?
Forgot Password?
or register. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Cho's, beloved dim sum spot, to reopen in Los Altos
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 5,330 views

Where DO The Elite Meet?
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 2,616 views

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 10 comments | 2,009 views

What Are Menlo Park’s Priorities?
By Erin Glanville | 10 comments | 433 views

Water Torture
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 318 views