Town Square

Post a New Topic

Atherton council favors using Watkins House as police crash pad

Original post made on May 22, 2014

Atherton police officers who need to catch some shut-eye between 12-hour shifts will soon have a pretty nice place to do just that -- Holbrook-Palmer Park's Watkins House, empty since the city manager declined the traditional offer of free housing.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, May 22, 2014, 10:40 AM

Comments (5)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by The Old Sage
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 22, 2014 at 2:11 pm

Wouldn't the offset of overtime costs provide a benefit to the town's bottom line- there would of course have to be measures in place schedule wise - but what a great deterrent to issues in the park if it is known that a police officer may or may not be staying there...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Huh?
a resident of Atherton: other
on May 22, 2014 at 3:50 pm

I'm not following how this measure would offset overtime costs. Although the article states the agreement is immediately revocable if a new town manager wants to move into the house, I believe in practice it won't work out that way since whenever any benefit is extended in government, it never gets rolled back. This was not a smart move. What might have made sense is to offer to RENT rooms on a per diem basis to the police officers who wanted to remain close to work for their next shift so the property continued to garner income. I don't understand why this wasn't put on the table.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Question
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on May 27, 2014 at 1:10 pm

Why is renting space for weddings in the park an acceptable commercial purpose under the law, but renting the house is not?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Answer
a resident of Atherton: other
on May 27, 2014 at 6:04 pm

You're not going to get an answer to that question, since it clearly shows the blatant double standard at work here. Of course the city manager's house could be rented out. If commercial weddings don't violate a will, that certainly wouldn't.

Of course the cops should pay for their room if they want to take advantage of it. They're paid enough.

Where are Lewis and Wiest on this issue?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Huh?
a resident of Atherton: other
on May 28, 2014 at 9:03 am

Hopefully the Almanac can do some investigative journalism on that question. Commercial purposes are deemed okay for things the troika wants, but not for what they don't. But we all know it's a yes/no as to whether commercial purposes are permitted or not. Anyway, I understand that since Stanford didn't exercise its rights under the will, the town can do anything it wants with the park at this point. I'd like this question clarified as well.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

It Can Wait
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 2,760 views

Hit the Bus
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 330 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 125 views

“I live near Sunset”
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 61 views