Town Square

Post a New Topic

Menlo Park council explores binding arbitration in police-discipline cases

Original post made on Jan 31, 2014

What options besides binding arbitration exist for handling appeals filed by police officers facing discipline? The Menlo Park City Council held a study session to explore alternatives.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, January 31, 2014, 8:24 AM

Comments (5)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Here's the deal
a resident of another community
on Jan 31, 2014 at 9:29 am

The real reason cops want binding arbitration wasn't covered in this article. Let me explain.

Arbitrators are highly paid for their time. And, the arbitrator must be agreed to by both parties, cop/union, and city.

This results in arbitrators who want to have a full plate of expensive work in front of them going the cops way most of the time, so they continue to get picked by the police union for future cases.

The securities industry has a similar racket going, called FINRA. Any account holder with a brokerage firm has agreed to disputes settled by FINRA arbitration. The FINRA arbitrators side with the securities people almost all the time, for the same rationale.

Stop this nonsense, and start serving the residents of your community. If courts of law are good enough for the people cops arrest, they're good enough for the cops themselves to appeal disciplinary actions.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by values
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Feb 1, 2014 at 11:41 am

Based on the number of comments, residents are much more upset about the new mascot and logo guidelines than this issue.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Lessons
a resident of another community
on Feb 1, 2014 at 11:52 am

They cared when the result of this arbitration policy resulted in the cop who admitted to seeing a prostitute during his shift retaining his job.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by ToBeFair
a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Feb 2, 2014 at 12:18 pm

Cops should get the same justice as the rest of us do. Their trials should be public, they should be publicly named, they should have the nastiest allegations smeared all over the news next to their mugshot.
What goes around should come around.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Feb 2, 2014 at 6:34 pm

Menlo Voter is a registered user.

Tobefair:

Their trials are public. the only thing not public is what the departmental discipline is.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,370 views

One night only: ‘Occupy the Farm’ screening in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 2,223 views

What Are Menlo Park’s Priorities?
By Erin Glanville | 37 comments | 1,542 views

Death with Dignity
By Chandrama Anderson | 3 comments | 1,412 views

Are you considering a remodel?
By Stuart Soffer | 2 comments | 285 views