Town Square

Post a New Topic

Calfiornia High Speed Rail legal problems reaching a climax.

Original post made by Morris Brown, Menlo Park: Park Forest, on Oct 30, 2013

(published as a ViewPoint in the Print edition of Almanac 10/30/2013)

Calfiornia High Speed Rail legal problems reaching a climax.

On Thursday, the Plaintiff's in the Tos et. al vs. the High Speed Rail Authority filed their reply brief

Link: Web Link

to the Attorney General's brief

Link: Web Link

in this highly watched case. (Sacramento Superior Court #34-2011-00113919).

The Court hearing on these issues is set for Nov 8, and the Judge will rule within 90 days thereafter.

Judge Kenny had ruled in August the Authority's funding plan for the Central Valley construction did not conform to requirements mandated in Prop 1A. He than ruled that the attorneys for both sides, file briefs on the issue of what remedies for these illegalities should be imposed.

The State Attorney General, representing the Authority, in her brief, did not contest the Judge's ruling. Rather she claimed that construction could start using only Federal grant money, and that Prop 1A would not be violated, since none of those funds were to be used.

The first construction, on which a contract has been awarded, is from Madera to Fresno, about 29 miles. The total cost of this section is about $2 billion. The total Federal grant funds amount to about $3.2 billion, and consists of two grants, the ARRA grant, about $2.4 billion, and the FY-2010 grant, about $930 million.

A key section in the Plaintiff's reply brief, just filed, notes the Authority seems to have overlooked in their plan, that the ARRA grant funds, are geographically restricted to construction in the Central Valley from Fresno south. Thus they cannot be used to fund the current construction contract awarded to Tutor-Perini for Madera to Fresno, all of which is north of Fresno. Thus under the Authority's proposed plan, only the FY-2010 funds amounting to $930 million are available for funding this $2 billion segment.

So at best, without the use of Prop 1A funds, it appears the Authority is over $1 billion short of the funds needed to complete this short 29 miles. However, they have already awarded a contract. Where is an additional over $1 billion going to be obtained?

Comments

There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,124 views

One night only: ‘Occupy the Farm’ screening in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 2,026 views

What Are Menlo Park’s Priorities?
By Erin Glanville | 37 comments | 1,458 views

Death with Dignity
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,258 views

Water Torture
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 456 views