Bar warns Wagstaffe to cut out the misconduct
Original post made by Deep throat on Oct 16, 2013
As in YOU'VE BEEN WARNED.
The Bar disciplined Wagstaffe with this warning based on a complaint it received about prosecutorial misconduct.
This revelation raises some important questions:
1. Why hasn't Wagstaffe disclosed to the public that he received such an extraordinary disciplinary warning? I have to believe the public has a right to know.
2. When is the Bar going to move from warnings to actual disbarment? Just how many warnings and complaints have to be issued?
3. Are the resident taxpayers Wagstaffe prosecutes for misconduct entitled to a warning also? Hardly. Like our congress exempting itself from ObamaCare, apparently Wagstaffe fancies himself as above the law.
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Most Seniors do not Need Senior Housing But Could Benefit from other Choice to Remain in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 45 comments | 1,883 views