Viewpoint - September 7, 2011

Editorial: Make conservation part of any water deal

The plan recently unveiled by the city of Menlo Park to drill into the aquifer at Nealon Park and pipe the water to the Sharon Heights Golf and Country Club apparently will save money for the city and the country club, but it remains to be seen if the deal would run afoul of numerous regulations that govern such taking of water.

Nealon Park neighbors object to the potential noise generated by drilling the well, which would last about a month. Other concerns include the city's prior commitments for water and whether the California Environmental Quality Act would come into play.

The city did not cover CEQA in its first discussion of drilling the Nealon Park well. If the City Council ultimately approves the plan, it could produce significant savings for the country club, which presumably is paying market rate now for 60 million gallons of Hetch Hetchy water a year from the city's water district. And the city would benefit, too, by being able to substantially reduce its purchase of Hetch Hetchy water, and continue to meet the country club's high demand for irrigation water.

Since the proposal is in the preliminary stages, no financial details have been made public. The city says the country club will pay for all costs associated with design and construction of piping infrastructure. If the project moves forward, the city would negotiate a price for the well water with the country club. A preliminary feasibility study found that there "appears to be significant potential savings to both the city and the country club under several scenarios."

Nealon Park neighbors, however, see very little upside in placing the well near their homes, raising concerns of ground subsidence in addition to construction impact and noise. And there is the obvious question: Why drill a well on city property to serve a private country club several miles away?

Acting Public Works Director Chip Taylor has explained that due to the bedrock layers under its property, the country club cannot drill for water on its own. And he added that city studies show withdrawing 60 million gallons of water a year would remove only a tiny percentage of the aquifer, which is constantly refreshed, contrary to some thinking that it is a finite pool of water that could be tapped out by a large well.

The city says the Nealon Park site was selected because it could produce a flow of 500 gallons per minute, or 720,000 gallons a day, more than adequate to serve the country club and the three parks (Nealon, Jack Lyle and Sharon, and La Entrada Middle School), which are located along the proposed pipeline route to Sharon Heights.

By using its own well, the city could significantly reduce its purchase of Hetch Hetchy water, which it buys now to serve the country club and its own parks. The city's water business serves 14,000 residents who live east of El Camino Real and in Sharon Heights. Other parts of the city are customers of California Water Service Company.

Water from the proposed "groundwater irrigation well" would not be treated, so it could only be used for irrigation. The city would continue to deliver potable Hetch Hetchy water to the club for drinking and other inside uses.

From the city's perspective, the Nealon Park well would reduce its consumption of Hetch Hetchy water by 60 million gallons per year, a substantial savings. The city adds that by reducing its water purchase, it would help the water district stay within its supply assurance from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, which operates the Hetch Hetchy system.

At least at first glance, it appears that the city could reduce its purchase of increasingly expensive Hetch Hetchy water and continue to deliver irrigation water to the Sharon Heights club, one of its biggest customers. We remain concerned, however, about the lack of attention paid to potential conservation in the city's studies so far. Any agreement with the country club should set an upper limit for water deliveries and contain incentives for conservation.

Whether it comes from the Hetch Hetchy system or a well at Nealon Park, water is not an unlimited resource. Nowhere in the city's preliminary analysis is there any mention of how the Nealon Park well would impact the long-term health of the aquifer. And even if the aquifer can sustain long-term withdrawals, we doubt if Menlo Park residents would want to see this water pumped out to simply save the city money, but mostly for the benefit of a private club.

In addition, in light of our recent droughts, it is hardly prudent to believe that Hetch Hetchy will run strong forever. There are going to be some bad years and Menlo Park's allocation could be cut. If we begin pumping out our aquifer now, it might not be there if our primary source runs dry some day.


Posted by Mondy, a resident of another community
on Sep 7, 2011 at 10:11 am

If water conservation is really a goal then this is the perfect time to install new pipes for recycled water.

Yes this would be expensive but I believe Palo Alto has recycled water available and over time using recycled water for irrigation would save 100's of millions of gallons of precious water.

This kind of irrigation will also recharge the aquifer instead of potentially depleting it.

In any case I think that this project will trigger a CEQA review as it could seriously impact the environment.

Posted by what about emergencies, a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Sep 7, 2011 at 2:20 pm

Conservation provisions are important.
Since this well is supposed to help with the city's supply in times of drought or emergency, there must be provisions that give the city priority for meeting community needs.
CEQA review is important. Before a decision is made, we need input from water professionals who can speak to the health and future of the aquifer in normal and drought times. Surely with the USGS located in Menlo Park we can find some easily.

Posted by Roxie Rorapaugh, a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on Sep 7, 2011 at 3:28 pm

This is not a project whose purpose is to provide emergency water to the city, those are other well projects. This well is specifically to provide water to the Sharon Heights Country Club to water their Golf Course. Some of the water may also be available to water some city parks or schools, but that would be the only benefit the city recieves.

The price of water will rise and Sharon Heights Country Club does not want to pay for it. This is an egregious attempt to steal from the public to benefit a few country club members who want a green golf course without paying for it. The City Council should say something about this immediately. My guess is someone on the city staff has been given a free membership to the country club or some other incentive.

It stinks, stinks, stinks. This is not an emergency well water project, the City of Menlo Park is not responsible for making sure a private country club has clean water for its golf course. If we need to ration water from Hetch Hetchy reservoir, shouldn't we start with golf courses anyway? At least make them pay more for water, that will get them to recycle water and use it more efficiently--maybe we can help them out with a once a week dog wash on the golf course grounds.

I really want to hear from a city council member, I hope they read this post.

Posted by Atherton neighbor, a resident of Atherton: West of Alameda
on Sep 7, 2011 at 3:47 pm

Since the water is just for irrigation--Why not use the water from Searsville lake which is only
2 or 3 blocks away from the golf club?

Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 7, 2011 at 4:43 pm

"Why not use the water from Searsville lake which is only"

Because Stanford doesn't give away anything. Only politicians and city staff are stupid enough to give away valuable resources to people that can well afford to pay for those resources.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields