"My feelings right now are probably similar to what Oakland A's fans felt on Friday night when they showed up for a game, bought their curly fries and beer, and then heard the announcement that the game was cancelled because the field was too wet to use," said Chuck Bernstein in response to a lengthy delay of the trial regarding a defamation lawsuit filed against him and fellow fire board director Virginia Chang Kiraly.
The lawsuit, brought by John Woodell, husband of Menlo Park Councilwoman Kirsten Keith, alleges that the defendants told people that Mr. Woodell had vandalized campaign signs during the 2011 Menlo Park Fire Protection District board election, after Mr. Bernstein discovered an uprooted Kiraly campaign sign in his yard lying next to a cellphone that turned out to be Mr. Woodell's. Mr. Woodell has denied vandalizing the sign.
The trial was supposed to start Monday (April 7) in San Mateo County Superior Court. But Mr. Woodell's counsel filed a last-minute motion under seal asking for a continuance.
The judge, after several hours, rescheduled the trial for Jan. 26, 2015, and also required the parties to once again attempt to settle the case. However, the judge denied the plaintiff's request to reopen discovery.
Last week, Mr. Woodell agreed to pay $5,000.01 to Ms. Kiraly in exchange for the dismissal of her defamation lawsuit against him, according to court documents. His attorney attributed the request for a continuance to press coverage of the settlement, which he said was supposed to be kept confidential.
Although the plaintiff's team was ready and eager to go to trial, attorney Seth Rosenberg said, they had to ask the court to move the trial date to leave time to deal with any violation of the confidentiality requirements.
"It wastes the court's time and our time when one party chooses not to follow the rules. So we are happy the trial got moved so we can now ask the court to address the misconduct," Mr. Rosenberg said.
According to some who were in court yesterday, the motion for a continuance also included a request for a change of venue on grounds that press coverage has prejudiced potential jurors against Mr. Woodell, in addition to a request for sanctions against the opposing attorney.
Harmeet Dhillon, who represents Ms. Kiraly, has challenged the claim that any misconduct had occurred. "The only counsel in this case from the beginning to issue press releases has been plaintiff John Woodell's counsel," she said.
She expressed deep disappointment at the inconvenience to witnesses and the court caused by the delay, but said the judge's ruling indicates "this meritless and damage-less case was ranked as such a low priority for the court that it told us to come back later -- much, much later. We share the court's apparent dim view of the merits of this case, and continue to hope that the plaintiff will re-examine his case, his motives and the ongoing cost and burden of this litigation, and choose to move on with his life."
At least one witness called to testify shared the disappointment about the trial's postponement.
"This trial is a travesty. A campaign sign for the fire board election that was found in the bushes with a cell phone does not warrant two years of litigation and hundreds of thousands of dollars paid to attorneys," said Menlo Park resident Brielle Johnck, who endorsed Ms. Kiraly during the campaign.
"As one who was served a subpoena to testify in this silly case, I am very disappointed a continuance was requested by John Woodell, as I was eager to put this stressful business behind me."
For details about the campaign sign incident and subsequent legal actions, click here.
This story contains 721 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.