News

Tuesday: Menlo council to hear Louise Street appeal

Where developer sees opportunity, neighbors see treasured green space

To people living on Louise Street in Menlo Park, it's a battle over the rights of residents versus developers. For Sam Sinnott, a developer, it's an exercise in frustration. The Menlo Park City Council will need to balance both perspectives during its March 5 meeting.

Mr. Sinnott bought a home at 1825 Santa Cruz Ave. last year with the intent of demolishing it to make way for a new single-family house he would then sell. Simple enough, except that the rear of the lot faces Louise Street -- an appealing location to build a driveway, given Santa Cruz Avenue's traffic.

The neighbors, some of whom have lived on Louise Street for decades, support Mr. Sinnott's plan -- as long as it doesn't include a driveway on their street.

The driveway is not a new idea. According to city documents, the owner of the property in 1984 asked permission to build a 15-foot-wide driveway there to evade the heavy traffic on Santa Cruz Avenue. The city said OK, but the owner never got around to the project.

The group of neighbors opposing the current attempt said they talked to 35 current and former Louise Street residents, and no one recalled any vehicle ever accessing the lot on that side. However, the man who sold the property to Mr. Sinnott told the city the intention was always to shift the lot's main entrance to Louise Street by creating a driveway.

Mr. Sinnott told the Almanac he thought the real issue was two illegal parking spaces next to a public right-of-way that potentially would disappear underneath his driveway, along with a swath of greenery in the right-of-way that neighbors say their children like to play in. He said he offered to create two parking spaces for the neighbors to keep using and will retain as much greenery as possible, among other mitigations, and remains open to suggestions.

"If they want a play area, we could design it," he said.

No dice. "We are opposed to any driveway connecting 1825 Santa Cruz Avenue to Louise Street. A concession for his right to infringe into our development is not what we are looking for," said resident Kiki Kapany, spokesperson for the Louise Street neighbors opposing the plan. She said the parking spaces have nothing to do with it.

Instead of a driveway, they want to claim the public right-of-way that fills the end of their street with a riotous tangle of bushes and trees. The neighbors pooled an estimated $10,000 to file an "abandonment application" that asks Menlo Park to grant the land to the adjoining homeowners, since the city has no use for it.

Abandonment benefits the neighborhood as a whole, rather than a single developer, they said.

It would also eliminate Mr. Sinnott's ability to create an exit from his property on Louise Street, according to the city staff's report.

Public Works Director Chip Taylor told the Almanac abandonment isn't common. "It really depends on the issue. ... if the council decides they are not going to approve the driveway there, there's no reason for the city to maintain that little piece of right-of-way."

But, he added, city staff recommended approving the driveway. The required encroachment permit is "typically done over the counter, but property owners can appeal any decision to the council." According to the city's report, however, "(s)taff cannot recollect the last time a driveway permit was ever appealed."

Developer and neighbors have reportedly sat down many times to hash out the issues. Louise Street resident Michael Schwarz described the conversations as "not especially productive. He's intent on building the driveway and at this point we're equally intent on stopping it."

Building the driveway would support Mr. Sinnott's attempt to change the address of the home from Santa Cruz Avenue to Louise Street, and that also rubs the neighbors the wrong way.

"We respect the developer's right to build a new house on the property. But he has no right to take a property on Santa Cruz Avenue and turn it into a property on Louise Street," said resident Kiki Kapany.

The city does appear to agree that the address of the home should remain on Santa Cruz Avenue, with staff saying no when Mr. Sinnott asked twice during the past 12 months if they'd support changing the address.

Despite that, an ad for a new $5.5 million home ran on Craigslist in December 2012: "New Development, 5BDRs, 5 baths, 1 Office, Guest house, basement, 2 car garage ... Current address: 1825 Santa Cruz. New expected address after development will be complete: 100 Louise St. Frontage of house will be on Louise St."

"My partner put that up; that's wrong," Mr. Sinnott said. He said the point of the ad was to find a buyer early enough that the family could have input into the layout, materials, and other customizable aspects of the house.

Changing the address requires a formal application to the Planning Commission, he said, and the previous staff reviews "were helping me to decide if I wanted to pursue the change concurrently with the encroachment permit. I decided not to and have a conforming building permit application moving forward now without a frontage change. If I go forward, it will be the first request."

Mr. Schwarz said that the developer appears to behave "as if it's a done deal," which has galvanized the opposition. "He tells us he's going to be improving our neighborhood and increasing our property values. Well, we think our neighborhood's fine and we're happy with our property values."

The regular City Council meeting starts at 7 p.m. in the council chambers at the Civic Center at 701 Laurel St. on Tuesday, March 5.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by whatever
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 5, 2013 at 11:02 am

$5.5 million for a house on Santa Cruz Ave?!?!
Geez Louise! should be the new motto of the Louise St residents.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Happy
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 5, 2013 at 12:45 pm

Greedy, selfish developers. Trying to make a few million bucks through converting public property to private use. He made a speculative bet that he could "move" that lot to a preferred address, and he's psychologically stuck thinking that he is due the money he thinks he can get for the private taking of public land.[Portion removed; disrespectful language.]

I hope the Louise St. neighbors raise enough money to convert the end of the street into a parklet. Redo the landscaping, put in a few benches or a picnic table (nice heavy concrete so it'll last).

MP and other towns need to grow some spine to stand up to these speculative developers. Spec houses are over-built, and the people who buy them have a false sense of superiority and entitlement because they're stupid enough to over-pay for a neighborhood. It really changes a neighborhood when the spec devs move in: snotty new people think they have more rights, just like this guy wanting $$$ from public property. A great neighborhood depends on a level of trust that gets interrupted when newbies think they're important. We're seeing this as the google, Facebook, etc. crowd move into our neighborhood. If they took a good look, they'd see that the old guys on the street did some pretty important stuff in their time, too.

The baloney about increasing property values is a distraction: if you love your house and neighborhood, price increases and decreases are irrelevant because you're staying, not moving.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Frugal
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Mar 5, 2013 at 1:21 pm

Sorry Mr. Sinnott. Looks like you paid too much this time. As an architect you should know better. The system finally caught up with you.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by beth
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 5, 2013 at 1:25 pm

This is a simple act of trying to readdress. For profit. Only. How dumb are the city council members? Or, another developer paying off the officials in one way or another?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned Santa Cruz Avenue Resident
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 5, 2013 at 1:36 pm

There is a current real estate listing using the Louise address:

Web Link


I am also concerned about having an 11 foot wall on Santa Cruz Avenue! "A guest house with an extended sound barrier 11 ft wall will be built on Santa Cruz to prevent noise coming through"


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Su
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 5, 2013 at 5:10 pm

I don't understand why this is being considered.
Menlo Park has an overall residential & commercial plan. It has since it began and people moved in. What's changed? Who changed it? And why? Answers, council members, let's hear your answers, now.
This should not be taking up anyone's time.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dharma
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 5, 2013 at 5:47 pm

"A green space" that is five trees clustered at someone elses property, and a small gravel parking lot that the neighbor built on public land adjacent to that person's long standing back driveway gate. This isn't about developer balls, its about parking squatters on public land - squatters who have a two car garage and wide driveway of their own. This soils the rep of those who genuinely work to protect a neighborhood. Bet it works too.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Garrett
a resident of another community
on Mar 5, 2013 at 6:06 pm

I think it is funny, most of homes in the area are built by home builder/developer, the other thing are we to own property for other people to use as their own.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 5, 2013 at 7:09 pm

I don't think an 11 foot wall will fly without a variance. MP allows 6 foot max.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Best High Dives to Watch the Game
By Laura Stec | 14 comments | 2,547 views

Flirtation
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,425 views

King of the Slides
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 1,112 views

Where the Sidewalk Ends
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 293 views